©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Radiol. Nov 28, 2017; 9(11): 405-412
Published online Nov 28, 2017. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i11.405
Published online Nov 28, 2017. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i11.405
Table 3 Association of the techniques used and rate of local recurrence (χ2 analysis)
| Trocar | Seldinger | Total | χ2 | P value | |
| Local recurrence, | |||||
| present, n | 2 | 0 | 2 | ||
| (%) | 4 | 0 | 1.9 | ||
| Local recurrence, | |||||
| none, n | 48 | 56 | 104 | ||
| (%) | 96 | 100 | 98.1 | 2330 | 0.215 |
| Total, | |||||
| n | 50 | 56 | 106 | ||
| (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 |
- Citation: Turan HG, Özdemir M, Acu R, Küçükay F, Özdemir FAE, Hekimoğlu B, Yıldırım UM. Comparison of seldinger and trocar techniques in the percutaneous treatment of hydatid cysts. World J Radiol 2017; 9(11): 405-412
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v9/i11/405.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v9.i11.405