Clinical Trials Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2016; 8(6): 600-609
Published online Jun 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i6.600
Table 2 Results of contrast-enhanced ultrasound qualitative analysis of 235 breast lesions
BenignMalignantSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)pearson χ2PCut-off
Enhanced time
Slow49117656.125.1645< 0.0001Synchronous
Synchronous2912
Rapid6173
Enhanced intensity
Hypo49981.256.834.5297< 0.0001Iso
Iso309
Hyper6078
Scope of lesion
Can’t distinguish33566.786.373.0619< 0.0001Equal
Smaller45
Equal8727
Larger1559
Enhanced direction
Diffuse1146334.48210.14070.0063Diffuse
Centripetal241
Centrifugal285
Internal homogeneity
Homogeneous76475154.71.62420.6539
Heterogeneous6349
Perfusion defect
Absent1045268.854.715.63910.0013Absent
Present3544
Crab claw like pattern
Absent137732498.627.9683< 0.0001Absent
Present223
Nourishing vessels
Absent1285542.792.137.9019< 0.0001Absent
Present1141
Margin after enhancement
Clear12178.164.742.9752< 0.0001Can’t distinguish
Almost clear4814
Can’t distinguish306
Unclear4975
Shape after enhancement
Regular28159.482.756.0275< 0.0001Can’t distinguish
Almost regular5632
Can’t distinguish316
Irregular2457