Comparisons between glucose analogue 2-deoxy-2-(18F)fluoro-D-glucose and 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer patients with bone lesions

doi:10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.200

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 8, Issue 2

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (9854)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

510

WORD

332

HTML

4356

Figures (1-3)

176

Tables (1-3)

212

Sum=5586

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

489

Download

1497

Sum=1986

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

824

Download

1458

Sum=2282

Feb 28, 2016 (publication date) through Sep 23, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (13)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Radiology

ISSN

1949-8470

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

World J Radiol. Feb 28, 2016; 8(2): 200-209
Published online Feb 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.200

Table 2 Patient-based analysis: Performance comparisons between 2-deoxy-2-(¹⁸F)fluoro-D-glucose and ¹⁸F-sodium positron emission tomography/computed tomography

	¹⁸F-FDG	¹⁸F-NaF
Sensitivity (%)	75.00 (55.10-88.00)	91.67 (74.15-97.68)
Specificity (%)	99.00 (84.54-100)	76.19 (54.91-89.37)
Positive predictive value (%)	99.00 (82.41-100)	81.48 (63.3 91.82)
Negative predictive value (%)	77.78 (59.24-89.39)	88.89 (67.2-96.90)
Error rate (%)	13.33 (6.26-26.18)	15.56 (7.75-28.78)
Accuracy (%)	86.67 (73.82-93.74)	84.44 (71.22-92.25)
Youden's index	0.75 (0.75-0.74)	0.6786 (0.68-0.6718)

Estimated parameters corresponding to each technique are presented with 95%CI between square brackets. ¹⁸F-FDG: 2-deoxy-2-(¹⁸F)fluoro-D-glucose; ¹⁸F-NaF: ¹⁸F-sodium.

Citation: Capitanio S, Bongioanni F, Piccardo A, Campus C, Gonella R, Tixi L, Naseri M, Pennone M, Altrinetti V, Buschiazzo A, Bossert I, Fiz F, Bruno A, DeCensi A, Sambuceti G, Morbelli S. Comparisons between glucose analogue 2-deoxy-2-(¹⁸F)fluoro-D-glucose and ¹⁸F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer patients with bone lesions. World J Radiol 2016; 8(2): 200-209
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i2/200.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.200