Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2015; 7(7): 170-179
Published online Jul 28, 2015. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i7.170
Table 4 Response evaluation using changes in computed tomography perfusion parameters in two representative cases
Date of studyMIP (HU)TTP (s)BF (mL/100 mL per minute)BV (mL/100 mL)MTT (s)PMB (mL/100 mL per minute)
Case 12013-4-2Normal cortex12011.1202.931.68.747.1
Renal tumour13413.5184.930.810.445.95
2013-9-11Normal cortex12113.220930.29.250.2
Renal tumour7911.517413.2518.1
2013-11-20Normal cortex13010.8229329.645.3
Renal tumour4212.35.71.212.48.2
Case 22013-10-23Normal cortex15711.923627.88.943.7
Renal tumour8812.364.49.38.918.7
2013-12-26Normal cortex14015.2170.929.510.542.1
Renal tumour82.714.860.97.98.413.8
2013-8-3Normal cortex21612.5315387255.2
Renal tumour84.612.372.387.410.8