BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Topic Highlight
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Apr 28, 2014; 6(4): 72-81
Published online Apr 28, 2014. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i4.72
Table 2 Validation results of the clinical decision support systems based on single voxel data
Ref.CDSSDifferentiation problemAccuracy
Supportive raw files
Short TELong TEShort + Long TE
Pérez-Ruiz et al[38]INTERRETLow grade meningiomas vs low grade glial tumors94a89b89c83b84c89c
Pseudotumoural diseasedvs tumorsevs normal brain86c81c92c
García-Gómez et al[41]eTUMOURLow grade glioma vs high grade tumor9284921.5 Tesla MRS data of Philips (sdat/spar) GE up to 9X (SAGE Pxxxx with an shf or sdf/shf) siemens scanners (numaris 4) jMRUI[58] text file
Meningioma vs glioma/Met927894
Low men vs glioma/Met vs low grade glioma877590
Sáez et al[44]HealthAgentsAggressive tumor vs meningioma vs low grade glial94-
Meningioma vs metastasis91-
High grade tumor vs low grade tumor8768 (ch)
Affected tissue vs non affected tissue99-
Tumor vs non tumor97-
Aggressive tumor vs non aggressive tumor8172 (ch)
Glioma vs embryonal tumor-72 (ch)
Glioblastoma vs low grade glioma84-
Glioblastoma vs meningioma91-
Meningioma vs low grade glioma92-
Metastasis vs low grade glioma85-
Vicente et al[46]CURIAM BTAggressive tumor vs non aggressive tumor8587 (ch)1.5 or 3 Tesla MRS data of different manufactures (Siemens, GE, Philips) by means of jMRUI[58] and jDMS[36]
Pilocytic astrocytoma/ependymoma grade II vs medulloblastoma88 (ch)85 (ch)89 (ch)
Pilocytic astrocytoma vs medulloblastoma92 (ch)94 (ch)95 (ch)
Pilocytic astrocytoma vs ependymoma grade II vs medulloblastoma76 (ch)69 (ch)92 (ch)


Write to the Help Desk