©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2013; 5(9): 334-344
Published online Sep 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i9.334
Published online Sep 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i9.334
Table 2 Imaging parameters in the three imaging systems used for the volunteer population
| 1.5T MR | non-dpTX 3.0TMR | dpTX 3.0TMR | |
| TR/TE, ms | 6300/79 | 6600/80 | 6000/68 |
| Sequence type | EPI-SE | ||
| FOV, mm × mm | 380 × 297 | ||
| Matrix | 192 × 150 | ||
| Slice thickness, mm | 6 | ||
| Interslice gap, mm | 0 | ||
| Spatial resolution, mm³ | 2.0 × 2.0 × 6.0 | ||
| Number slices | 35 | ||
| b-values | 0, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 | ||
| Parallel imaging | GRAPPA 2 | ||
| Acquisition time, min | 7:02 | 7:22 | 6:54 |
| Respiratory control | Free breathing | ||
| Fat suppression | SPAIR | ||
| Averages | 4 | ||
| Bandwidth, Hz/px | 1628 | ||
- Citation: Riffel P, Rao RK, Haneder S, Meyer M, Schoenberg SO, Michaely HJ. Impact of field strength and RF excitation on abdominal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. World J Radiol 2013; 5(9): 334-344
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v5/i9/334.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v5.i9.334