©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2013; 5(9): 334-344
Published online Sep 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i9.334
Published online Sep 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i9.334
Table 1 Imaging parameters in the three imaging systems used for the patient population
| 1.5T MR | non-dpTX 3.0T MR | dpTX 3.0T MR | |
| TR/TE, ms | 5600/75 | 6000/76 | 6400/63 |
| Sequence type | EPI-SE | EPI-SE | EPI-SE |
| FOV, mm × mm | 380 × 308 | 380 × 308 | 380 × 308 |
| Matrix | 192 × 156 | 192 × 156 | 192 × 156 |
| Slice thickness, mm | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Interslice gap, mm | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Spatial resolution, mm³ | 2.0 × 2.0 × 6.0 | 2.0 × 2.0 × 5.0 | 2.0 × 2.0 × 5.0 |
| Number slices | 32 | 33 | 35 |
| b-values | 50, 400, 800 | 50, 400, 800 | 50, 400, 800 |
| Parallel imaging | GRAPPA 2 | GRAPPA 2 | GRAPPA 2 |
| Acquisition time, min | 4:30 | 5:06 | 4:46 |
| Respiratory control | Free breathing | Free breathing | Free breathing |
| Fat suppression | SPAIR | SPAIR | SPAIR |
| Averages | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Bandwidth, Hz/px | 1736 | 1736 | 1736 |
- Citation: Riffel P, Rao RK, Haneder S, Meyer M, Schoenberg SO, Michaely HJ. Impact of field strength and RF excitation on abdominal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. World J Radiol 2013; 5(9): 334-344
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v5/i9/334.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v5.i9.334