Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2012; 4(7): 328-334
Published online Jul 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i7.328
Table 3 Results of the re-analysed data from centre 1 (n = 201), shown pre- and post-implementation of the curve offset, separated for the two devicespre- and post-offset correction
DeviceSlopeIntercept (mg/dL)r2Mean difference (mg/dL) (method-difference)STDV of differences (method-difference)% bias
Pre offsetA0.7650.0650.870-0.160.16-15.54
B0.7450.0890.845-0.160.17-14.76
Post offsetA1.110-0.0990.8700.010.190.39
B1.088-0.0840.8450.000.20-0.02