Ultrasound- and MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery for prostate cancer

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 4, Issue 6

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

365

HTML

2831

Figures (1-2)

141

Tables (1-4)

140

Sum=3477

Jun 28, 2012 (publication date) through Apr 25, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Radiology

ISSN

1949-8470

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Review

World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2012; 4(6): 247-252
Published online Jun 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i6.247

Table 4 Comparison between high intensity focused ultrasound and magnetic resonance guided focus ultrasound surgery in prostate cancer treatment

	HIFU	MRgFUS
Number of published patients (pt)	3018 patients[3]	5 patients[21]
		21 patients[24,25] reported in International Meeting and Congress
Free biological disease survival rate	1 yr survival rate: 78%-84%[11]	No provide
Complication rate	0%-58%[11]	No provide in human patients
Retreatment	7%-43%[7]	None

HIFU: High intensity focused ultrasound; MRgFUS: Magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound surgery.

Citation: Zini C, Hipp E, Thomas S, Napoli A, Catalano C, Oto A. Ultrasound- and MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery for prostate cancer. World J Radiol 2012; 4(6): 247-252
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v4/i6/247.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v4.i6.247