Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2026; 18(9): 123720
Published online Sep 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.123720
Published online Sep 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.123720
Table 4 Differences in mean volumes among Syngo.via, OsiriX® and Syngo.via for all scans, mean ± SD
| Item | Mean differences in mL | Mean percent differences | P value |
| TLV | |||
| OsiriX® vs Syngo.via | -45.3 ± 49.0 | -2.6 ± 3.0 | < 0.001 |
| OsiriX® vs Synapse 3D | -78.5 ± 48.8 | -3.9 ± 3.6 | < 0.001 |
| Syngo.via vs Synapse 3D | -33.2 ± 42.0 | -1.7 ± 3.9 | < 0.001 |
| SII/III | |||
| OsiriX® vs Syngo.via | -4.4 ± 36.0 | -0.8 ± 14.0 | 0.111 |
| OsiriX® vs Synapse 3D | -26.2 ± 29.8 | -8.5 ± 9.5 | < 0.001 |
| Syngo.via vs Synapse 3D | -21.8 ± 33.6 | -6.8 ± 11.1 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: van der Velden AL, Knapen RRMM, James S, Rahmani H, Brecheisen R, van Kuijk SMJ, Wildberger JE, van Dam RM, van der Leij C. Comparing the reliability of three software programmes for manual and (semi-)automatic volumetry in healthy livers. World J Radiol 2026; 18(9): 123720
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i9/123720.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.123720