Comparing the reliability of three software programmes for manual and (semi-)automatic volumetry in healthy livers

doi:10.4329/wjr.123720

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 9

This Article

(2)

(0)

(2)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Radiology

ISSN

1949-8470

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.

World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2026; 18(9): 123720
Published online Sep 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.123720

Table 1 The intraclass correlation coefficient between the two observers in each liver volume program

Item	n	ICC	95%CI
Syngo.via TLV	30	0.999	0.997-0.999
Syngo.via SII/III	30	0.958	0.912-0.980
OsiriX^® TLV	30	0.996	0.992-0.998
OsiriX^® SII/III	30	0.977	0.952-0.989
Synapse 3D TLV	30	0.999	0.998-0.999
Synapse 3D SII/III	30	0.975	0.948-0.988

The differences in volumes for total liver volume and segment II/III between both observers are shown in Table 2. For all three software programs, statistical differences were found for total liver volume and segment II/III volumes between the two observers (P value < 0.020). ICC: Intraclass correlation coefficient; TLV: Total liver volume; SII/III: Segment II/III.

Full Size Table

Citation: van der Velden AL, Knapen RRMM, James S, Rahmani H, Brecheisen R, van Kuijk SMJ, Wildberger JE, van Dam RM, van der Leij C. Comparing the reliability of three software programmes for manual and (semi-)automatic volumetry in healthy livers. World J Radiol 2026; 18(9): 123720
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i9/123720.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.123720

van der Velden AL, Knapen RRMM, James S, Rahmani H, Brecheisen R, van Kuijk SMJ, Wildberger JE, van Dam RM, van der Leij C. Comparing the reliability of three software programmes for manual and (semi-)automatic volumetry in healthy livers. World J Radiol 2026; 18(9): 123720 [DOI: 10.4329/wjr.123720]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.