Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2026; 18(9): 123597
Published online Sep 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.123597
Published online Sep 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.123597
Table 4 Comparison of predictive model performance in the validation set
| Model | AUC (95%CI) | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | F1 score |
| Model-C (clinical features) | 0.712 (0.548-0.876) | 0.700 | 0.652 | 0.786 | 0.731 |
| Model-R (whole-tumor radiomics) | 0.783 (0.634-0.932) | 0.767 | 0.739 | 0.810 | 0.772 |
| Model-RD (radiomics + deep learning) | 0.835 (0.701-0.969) | 0.833 | 0.826 | 0.845 | 0.823 |
| Model-Fusion (this study) | 0.892 (0.821-0.963) | 0.867 | 0.870 | 0.857 | 0.863 |
- Citation: Wang SP, Chen ZG, Shan XJ, Jin M, Zhao W, Tong X, Meng X. Development and validation of a multimodal MRI habitat-based deep learning fusion model for predicting 252Cf neutron therapy response in cervical cancer. World J Radiol 2026; 18(9): 123597
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i9/123597.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.123597