Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2026; 18(9): 123597
Published online Sep 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.123597
Published online Sep 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.123597
Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients in the training set and the validation set
| Characteristic | Training set (n = 70) | Validation set (n = 30) | Statistic | P value |
| Age (years) | 52.3 ± 9.7 | 51.8 ± 10.2 | t = 0.245 | 0.807 |
| FIGO stage (2018) | ||||
| IB stage | 12 (17.1) | 5 (16.7) | ||
| IIA-IIB stage | 28 (40.0) | 13 (43.3) | χ2 = 0.243 | 0.886 |
| IIIA-IIIB stage | 21 (30.0) | 9 (30.0) | ||
| IVA stage | 9 (12.9) | 3 (10.0) | ||
| Pathological types | ||||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 61 (87.1) | 26 (86.7) | χ2 = 0.003 | 0.954 |
| Adenocarcinoma | 9 (12.9) | 4 (13.3) | ||
| Maximum tumor diameter (cm) | 4.8 ± 1.4 | 4.6 ± 1.3 | t = 0.688 | 0.493 |
| SCC-Ag (ng/mL; median) | 6.2 (2.1-18.4) | 5.9 (1.8-20.1) | Z = 0.312 | 0.755 |
| RBE-weighted total dose of 252Cf neutrons at A point (Gy) | 34.2 ± 3.6 | 33.8 ± 3.9 | t = 0.514 | 0.608 |
| Overall dose of brachytherapy (Gy) | 47.8 ± 1.9 | 48.1 ± 2.0 | t = 0.727 | 0.469 |
| Response to the treatment (efficacy rate) | 56 (80.0) | 23 (76.7) | χ2 = 0.181 | 0.671 |
| Complete response | 32 (45.7) | 14 (46.7) | ||
| Partial response | 24 (34.3) | 9 (30.0) | ||
| Stable disease | 10 (14.3) | 5 (16.7) | ||
| Progressive disease | 4 (5.7) | 2 (6.7) |
- Citation: Wang SP, Chen ZG, Shan XJ, Jin M, Zhao W, Tong X, Meng X. Development and validation of a multimodal MRI habitat-based deep learning fusion model for predicting 252Cf neutron therapy response in cervical cancer. World J Radiol 2026; 18(9): 123597
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i9/123597.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.123597