Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Aug 28, 2026; 18(8): 123757
Published online Aug 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.123757
Published online Aug 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.123757
Table 5 Independent validation cohort performance, 95%CI
| Model | AUC | Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Precision |
| Logistic regression | 0.89 (0.82-0.95) | 83.3 (74.2-90.3) | 84.7 (75.1-91.7) | 81.5 (71.3-89.2) | 0.82 (0.73-0.89) |
| Random forest | 0.85 (0.77-0.91) | 80.0 (70.5-87.5) | 81.2 (71.2-88.8) | 78.6 (68.1-86.8) | 0.79 (0.69-0.87) |
| Support vector machine | 0.81 (0.72-0.88) | 76.7 (66.9-84.8) | 78.4 (68.2-86.5) | 74.1 (63.3-83.1) | 0.76 (0.66-0.84) |
- Citation: Sathish S, Nigam H, Gupta R. Cone-beam computed tomography-based radiomic analysis of architectural phenotypes in jaw cysts and tumors using interpretable artificial intelligence models. World J Radiol 2026; 18(8): 123757
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i8/123757.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.123757