Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Aug 28, 2026; 18(8): 123757
Published online Aug 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.123757
Published online Aug 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.123757
Table 4 Artificial intelligence model performance for architectural phenotype classification, 95%CI
| Model | AUC | Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Precision | F1-score |
| Logistic regression | 0.92 (0.87-0.96) | 85.0 (78.2-90.4) | 87.2 (80.1-92.5) | 82.6 (74.8-88.9) | 0.84 (0.77-0.90) | 0.84 (0.77-0.90) |
| Random forest | 0.87 (0.81-0.92) | 81.0 (73.7-86.9) | 83.1 (75.4-89.1) | 78.4 (70.2-85.1) | 0.80 (0.72-0.86) | 0.80 (0.72-0.86) |
| Support vector machine | 0.84 (0.77-0.89) | 79.0 (71.5-85.2) | 80.4 (72.5-86.8) | 76.8 (68.4-83.7) | 0.78 (0.70-0.85) | 0.78 (0.70-0.85) |
- Citation: Sathish S, Nigam H, Gupta R. Cone-beam computed tomography-based radiomic analysis of architectural phenotypes in jaw cysts and tumors using interpretable artificial intelligence models. World J Radiol 2026; 18(8): 123757
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i8/123757.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.123757