BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Aug 28, 2026; 18(8): 121065
Published online Aug 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.121065
Table 4 Cardiac radiomics applications relevant to perioperative risk assessment
Application
Imaging modality
Key radiomic features
Diagnostic performance
Perioperative relevance
Coronary plaque vulnerabilityCCTATexture features (GLCM, GLRLM)AUC 0.73 vs 0.65 (visual)Identification of high-risk plaques; perioperative MI risk
Acute MI predictionCardiac CTKurtosis, short-run high gray-level emphasisAUC 0.90Perioperative cardiac event prediction
Myocardial pathology classificationCardiac CTMultiple texture featuresSensitivity 86%, specificity 81%Subclinical cardiomyopathy detection
Cardiac amyloidosis detectionCardiac CTRadiomic signatureAUC 0.91 (external validation)Restrictive physiology identification; fluid management
POAF prediction (CABG)Non-contrast CT (EAT)EAT texture and shapeImproved combined modelPostoperative arrhythmia risk; anticoagulation planning
POAF prediction (aortic stenosis)CT (EAT)Maximum grey-level, heterogeneityAUC 0.80Rate/rhythm control prophylaxis
MACE predictionCCTA (PVAT)Fat radiomic profileΔC-statistic 0.126Long-term cardiovascular risk stratification
Acute MI vs stable CADCCTA (PCAT)Pericoronary fat radiomicsAUC 0.87 vs 0.77 (attenuation)Coronary inflammation assessment


Write to the Help Desk