BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2026; 18(5): 120146
Published online May 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.120146
Table 1 Comparative diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography tracers in recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma
Tracer
Ref.
Patient-based detection rate (sensitivity)
Lesion-based detection rate
Key correlate/finding
18F-FDOPATreglia et al[4], 201266% (pooled)71% (pooled)Sensitivity rises to 86% with Ctn > 1000 pg/mL
Lee et al[5], 2020Highest among 5 tracers (network meta-analysis)N/ARanked 1 for patient-level detection
Zhang et al[6], 202495% (single-centre cohort, n = 109)N/AHigh specificity (93%) and accuracy (94%)
18F-FDGCheng et al[13], 201268-69% (pooled)N/AGeneral performance in recurrent/metastatic MTC
Treglia et al[14], 201275% (with Ctn > 1000 pg/mL)N/ASensitivity rises to 91% with CEA DT < 24 months
Verbeek et al[15], 201277% positivity in patients with Ctn DT < 24 monthsN/AStrong correlation with aggressive disease
68Ga-SSTRTreglia et al[17], 201763.5% (pooled)N/ALower than FDOPA; comparable to FDG
Hayes et al[18], 202126% show sufficient uptake for PRRTN/AHighlights limited PRRT eligibility
Castroneves et al[19], 2018100% for bone metastasesN/ASuperior to bone scintigraphy (44%) for bone lesions


Write to the Help Desk