Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2026; 18(5): 119213
Published online May 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119213
Published online May 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119213
Table 2 Combined area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio for E-cervix parameters and conventional measurement parameters
| Parameters | AUC (95%CrI) | Sensitivity (95%CrI) | Specificity (95%CrI) | DOR (95%CrI) | LR+ (95%CrI) | LR- (95%CrI) | S | RR_Se vs CL | RR_Sp vs CL |
| CL | 0.70 (0.60-0.77) | 0.63 (0.54-0.71) | 0.67 (0.57-0.76) | 3.58 (1.91-6.25) | 1.89 (1.24-2.90) | 0.56 (0.39-0.82) | 0.28 (0.08-1.00) | 1.00 (1.00-1.00) | 1.00 (1.00-1.00) |
| ACA | 0.86 (0.71-0.93) | 0.78 (0.65-0.89) | 0.75 (0.58-0.87) | 13.65 (3.88-35.20) | 3.15 (1.55-7.04) | 0.29 (0.13-0.61) | 5.70 (0.33-15.00) | 1.25 (1.01-1.53) | 1.13 (0.86-1.40) |
| IOS | 0.76 (0.65-0.83) | 0.56 (0.45-0.67) | 0.80 (0.70-0.87) | 5.47 (2.59-10.06) | 2.75 (1.50-5.13) | 0.55 (0.38-0.78) | 0.73 (0.14-3.00) | 0.90 (0.71-1.10) | 1.20 (1.01-1.44) |
| EOS | 0.72 (0.68-0.76) | 0.57 (0.51-0.64) | 0.78 (0.75-0.81) | 4.00 (2.81-5.69) | 2.27 (1.65-3.12) | 0.61 (0.50-0.75) | 0.58 (0.08-2.33) | 1.07 (0.86-1.29) | 0.98 (0.75-1.24) |
| IOS/EOS ratio | 0.72 (0.58-0.80) | 0.68 (0.57-0.78) | 0.63 (0.49-0.75) | 4.05 (1.64-8.14) | 1.84 (1.10-3.17) | 0.50 (0.30-0.89) | 0.46 (0.08-2.33) | 1.09 (0.89-1.31) | 0.95 (0.72-1.19) |
| ECI | 0.73 (0.63-0.80) | 0.67 (0.57-0.76) | 0.67 (0.56-0.77) | 4.52 (2.24-8.21) | 2.04 (1.30-3.29) | 0.49 (0.31-0.77) | 0.60 (0.09-2.33) | 1.08 (0.89-1.29) | 1.01 (0.81-1.23) |
| HR | 0.80 (0.72-0.85) | 0.76 (0.68-0.82) | 0.70 (0.60-0.78) | 7.71 (4.06-13.06) | 2.51 (1.69-3.75) | 0.35 (0.23-0.54) | 2.18 (0.20-9.00) | 1.21 (1.04-1.41) | 1.05 (0.87-1.28) |
| Combined | 0.91 (0.83-0.95) | 0.83 (0.74-0.89) | 0.83 (0.73-0.90) | 26.23 (10.47-54.64) | 4.76 (2.70-8.74) | 0.21 (0.12-0.36) | 12.90 (3.67-15.00) | 1.32 (1.13-1.55) | 1.25 (1.04-1.48) |
- Citation: Zhang HP, Li N, Li F, Zhou YQ. Predictive performance of cervical elastography for preterm birth: A head-to-head network meta-analysis. World J Radiol 2026; 18(5): 119213
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i5/119213.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119213