Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2026; 18(5): 119213
Published online May 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119213
Published online May 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119213
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies (n = 15)
| Ref. | Country | Study design | Pregnancy status | Gestational weeks | Mean age (in years) | Sample size (PTB/TD) | Detection method | Ultrasonic diagnostic device |
| Zhang et al[14], 2021 | China | Retrospective | Singleton pregnancy | 16~28 | 22~41 (30.01 ± 4.03) | 171 (24/147) | CL, IOS, IOS/EOS ratio, HR | Samsung Medison WS80A |
| Xiong et al[15], 2021 | China | Retrospective | Singleton pregnancy | 20~24 | PTB: 26 (23.75, 27.00); TD: 26 (25.00, 27.00) | 85 (40/45) | CL, IOS, ECI, EOS | Samsung Medison WS80A |
| Wang et al[16], 2022 | China | Retrospective | Singleton pregnancy | 14~28 | 20~36 (29.96 ± 3.01) | 200 (31/169) | CL, ECI, IOS, IOS/EOS ratio, HR | Samsung Medison WS80A |
| Cha et al[17], 2022 | Korea | Prospective | Singleton pregnancy | 14~24 | PTB: 33.8 ± 3.8; TD: 34.2 ± 3.8 | 66 (8/58) | CL, ECI, EOS, IOS, HR | Samsung Medison WS80A |
| Nazzaro et al[18], 2022 | Italy | Retrospective | Singleton pregnancy | 23~33 | PTB: 28.9 ± 6.1; TD: 28.4 ± 6.1 | 95 (42/53) | CL, HR | Samsung Medison WS80A |
| Li et al[19], 2023 | China | Retrospective | Singleton Pregnancy | 14~27 and 28~36 | PTB: 34 (29, 37); TD: 31 (28, 32) | 149 (31/118) | HR | Samsung HERA W10/W9 |
| Li et al[20], 2023 | China | Retrospective | Singleton pregnancy | 16~28 and 22~24 | PTB: 24~37 (29.7 ± 3.6); TD: 24~37 (29.6 ± 3.6) | 82 (14/68) | ACA, ECI, IOS/EOS ratio, HR | Samsung (NR) |
| Wu et al[21], 2024 | China | Retrospective | Singleton and multiple pregnancy | 18~27 | 23~40 (30.22 ± 4.03) | 225 (105/120) | ECI, EOS, IOS | Samsung HERA W10 |
| Liu et al[22], 2024 | China | Prospective | Multiple pregnancy | 18~24 | 21~40 (30.9 ± 3.8) | 97 (35/62) | ACA, ECI, IOS, EOS, IOS/EOS ratio, HR | Samsung HERA W9 |
| He et al[23], 2024 | China | Prospective | Singleton pregnancy | 18~24 | PTB: 30.6 ± 3.2; TD: 30.2 ± 3.3 | 228 (26/202) | CL, EOS, IOS | Samsung Medison WS80A |
| Nazzaro et al[24], 2024 | Italy | Retrospective | Multiple pregnancy | 23~33 | PTB: 27.9 ± 5.5; TD: 29.3 ± 6.2 | 63 (44/19) | CL, HR | Samsung Medison WS80A |
| Yu et al[25], 2025 | China | Prospective | Multiple pregnancy | 20~24 | 18~40 (32.50 ± 3.27) | 130 (40/90) | CL, IOS, HR | Samsung HERA XW9 |
| He et al[26], 2025 | China | Retrospective | Singleton Pregnancy | 16~28 | 22~40 (31.12 ± 4.06) | 88 (21/67) | ACA, ECI, HR | Samsung (NR) |
| Ma et al[27], 2025 | China | Retrospective | Singleton pregnancy | 11~18 | PTB: 29.10 ± 2.39; TD: 29.12 ± 2.36 | 136 (25/111) | CL, ACA, ECI, EOS, IOS, IOS/EOS ratio, HR | Samsung (NR) |
| Kwon et al[28], 2025 | Korea | Prospective | Singleton and multiple pregnancy | 24~34 | PTB:34 (21, 40); TD: 33 (26, 42) | 150 (84/66) | CL, ECI, IOS/EOS ratio | Samsung Medison WS80A |
- Citation: Zhang HP, Li N, Li F, Zhou YQ. Predictive performance of cervical elastography for preterm birth: A head-to-head network meta-analysis. World J Radiol 2026; 18(5): 119213
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i5/119213.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119213