Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2026; 18(5): 119048
Published online May 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119048
Published online May 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119048
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients undergoing abdominal photon-counting computed tomography and energy-integrating detector computed tomography, n (%)/mean ± SD/median (interquartile range)
| Variable | PCCT | EID-CT | P value |
| Gender | 0.8222 | ||
| Male | 17 (42.5) | 19 (47.5) | |
| Female | 23 (57.5) | 21 (52.5) | |
| Age | 42.58 ± 15.49 | 47.68± 12.0 | 0.056 |
| Height (cm) | 165.85 ± 8.66 | 163.15 ± 7.71 | 0.145 |
| Weight (kg) | 61.00 (57.50-72.00) | 65.00 (56.50-73.00) | 0.769 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.49 ± 3.43 | 24.39 ± 4.28 | 0.299 |
- Citation: Zhu TT, Zhu XY, Yang M, Liu WM, Yang WJ, Liu X. Photon-counting computed tomography enables low-dose, high-quality abdominal imaging: A comparative study with energy-integrating detector computed tomography. World J Radiol 2026; 18(5): 119048
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i5/119048.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v18.i5.119048