BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Apr 28, 2026; 18(4): 119851
Published online Apr 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i4.119851
Table 3 Comparison of variables between successful and failed computer-aided detection
Characteristic
Factors
Overall (n = 26)
Detection success (n = 17)
Detection failure (n = 9)
P value
LocationRight upper lobe734-
Right middle lobe321
Right lower lobe431
Left upper lobe321
Lingular segment642
Left lower lobe330
Contact with adjacent structuresPresent1913 (68)6 (32)0.63
Absent63 (50)3 (50)
Morphology1Simple type2213 (59)9 (41)0.26
Complex type44 (100)0 (0)
Treatment indication2Present1813 (72)5 (28)0.38
Absent84 (50)4 (50)
Feeding artery diameter (mm)3.4 (3.0, 4.0)3.4 (2.4, 4.8)0.47
Maximum lesion length (mm)6.5 (4.9, 9.6)5.5 (2.5, 11.0)0.65


Write to the Help Desk