Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Apr 28, 2026; 18(4): 119851
Published online Apr 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i4.119851
Published online Apr 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i4.119851
Table 2 Differences in computer-aided detection rates according to imaging conditions, n (%)
| Imaging conditions | Overall (image series, | Detection success (image series, n = 44) | Detection failure (image series, n = 30) | P value | |
| Contrast | Non-contrast | 33 | 19 (58) | 14 (42) | 0.29 |
| Pulmonary arterial phase | 24 | 17 (71) | 7 (29) | ||
| Parenchymal phase | 17 | 8 (47) | 9 (53) | ||
| Window setting | Lung window | 31 | 19 (61) | 12 (39) | 0.79 |
| Mediastinal window | 43 | 25 (58) | 18 (42) | ||
- Citation: Azama K, Tsuchiya N, Toyosato S, Yonemoto K, Nishie A. Artificial intelligence-based lung nodule detection for pulmonary arteriovenous fistulas on chest computed tomography. World J Radiol 2026; 18(4): 119851
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i4/119851.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v18.i4.119851