Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2026; 18(3): 118119
Published online Mar 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i3.118119
Published online Mar 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i3.118119
Table 5 Intraclass correlation coefficient for inter-observer agreement
| Measurement | ICC | Absolute agreement | 95%CI for ICC | P value |
| SNR | ||||
| With MAR | 0.751 | Good | 0.570-0.877 | < 0.001 |
| Without MAR | 0.460 | Poor | 0.205-0.697 | < 0.001 |
| Reference | 0.790 | Good | 0.628-0.898 | < 0.001 |
| CNR | ||||
| With MAR | 0.764 | Good | 0.488-0.809 | < 0.001 |
| Without MAR | 0.487 | Poor | 0.230-0.717 | < 0.001 |
| Reference | 0.810 | Good | 0.684-0.916 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Mounir AM, Elmokadem AH, Saleh GAH, El-Morsy A, Abd El-Raouf GH. Role of metal artifact reduction software in computed tomography angiography of lower limb metallic prosthesis: A retrospective study. World J Radiol 2026; 18(3): 118119
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i3/118119.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v18.i3.118119