Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2026; 18(3): 116826
Published online Mar 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i3.116826
Published online Mar 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i3.116826
Table 2 Results of the subgroup analysis, 95% confidence intervals
| Number of studies | Sensitivity | P value | Specificity | P value | AUC | |||||
| Sensitivity | P value | I2 | Specificity | P value | I2 | |||||
| Overall | 49 | 0.84 (0.81-0.87) | < 0.01 | 93.08 (91.76-94.40) | 0.78 (0.70-0.84) | < 0.01 | 94.68 (93.75-95.62) | 0.88 (0.85-0.91) | ||
| Sequences | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | ||||||||
| mpMRI with DCE | 20 | 0.88 (0.84-0.91) | < 0.01 | 72.75 (60.62-84.87) | 0.83 (0.76-0.88) | < 0.01 | 84.66 (78.82-90.50) | 0.82 (0.81-0.97) | ||
| mpMRI without DCE | 29 | 0.82 (0.77-0.87) | < 0.01 | 94.41 (93.11-95.71) | 0.73 (0.67-0.83) | < 0.01 | 95.90 (95.03-96.77) | 0.87 (0.81-0.94) | ||
| Lesion segmentation | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | ||||||||
| 2D | 7 | 0.79 (0.71-0.83) | < 0.01 | 92.54 (88.50-96.59) | 0.76 (0.73-0.83) | < 0.01 | 93.33 (89.82-96.84) | 0.78 (0.73-0.81) | ||
| 3D | 42 | 0.85 (0.82-0.88) | < 0.01 | 92.21 (91.43-94.38) | 0.86 (0.77-0.89) | < 0.01 | 94.56 (93.52-95.60) | 0.86 (0.82-0.95) | ||
| Tumor aggressiveness | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | ||||||||
| csPCa | 30 | 0.85 (0.82-0.88) | < 0.01 | 95.02 (93.92-96.12) | 0.87 (0.84-0.92) | < 0.01 | 96.21 (95.44-96.96) | 0.93 (0.81-0.95) | ||
| Non-csPCa | 19 | 0.71 (0.63-0.77) | < 0.01 | 69.89 (55.77-84.00) | 0.78 (0.73-0.82) | < 0.01 | 83.84 (77.44-90.25) | 0.76 (0.72-0.83) | ||
- Citation: Zhong SY, Deng XR, Han BC, Yang LQ, Ye ST, Niu XK. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics for detecting prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Radiol 2026; 18(3): 116826
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i3/116826.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v18.i3.116826