©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Jan 28, 2026; 18(1): 113747
Published online Jan 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i1.113747
Published online Jan 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i1.113747
Table 4 Radiation characteristics and effective dose in all participated radiology departments, mean ± SD
| Characteristic | Study cases (n = 1367) | Negative scan (n = 578) | Positive scan (n = 789) | P value1 |
| CTDIvol (mGy) | 84.33 ± 55.80 (8.0-596.0) | 77.90 ± 49.11 (8.0-374.0) | 89.01 ± 59.80 (9.0-596.0) | 0.004 |
| Scan length (cm) | 44.33 ± 31.01 (5.0-153.0) | 45.45 ± 32.17 (7.0-150.0) | 43.53 ± 30.13 (5.0-153.0) | 0.520 |
| DLP (mGy.cm) | 2299.87 ± 1115.28 (275.0-8671.0) | 2148.14 ± 1102.74 (275.0-6325.0) | 2410.52 ± 1112.07 (354.0-8671.0) | < 0.001 |
| ED (mSv) | 21.38 ± 10.37 (2.5-80.64) | 19.98 ± 10.26 (2.56-58.82) | 22.41 ± 10.35 (3.29-80.64) | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Al-Kandari L, Masoomi MA, El-Gargani AA, Hamza MA, Agha RM. Rationalizing whole-body computed tomography in trauma: A national audit on resource utilization and strategies to minimize radiation exposure. World J Radiol 2026; 18(1): 113747
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i1/113747.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v18.i1.113747