©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2025; 17(9): 111215
Published online Sep 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i9.111215
Published online Sep 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i9.111215
Table 4 Highest parameters of endometrial peristalsis analysis and their relations with clinical and ultrasound parameters
| Transfer direction | Peristalsis intensity | Transfer time (second) | Transfer distance (mm) | Transfer velocity (mm/second) | |||
| CF | FC | ||||||
| Menstrual cycle | Proliferate phase | 39 | 28 | 25.857 ± 10.307 | 6.255 ± 4.722 | 12.478 ± 7.429 | 2.643 ± 1.790 |
| Secretory phase | 30 | 13 | 32.180 ± 12.162 | 5.793 ± 3.914 | 13.177 ± 6.899 | 3.113 ± 2.213 | |
| t/χ² | 1.497 | 2.953 | 0.539 | 0.500 | 1.235 | ||
| P value | 0.234 | 0.004 | 0.591 | 0.618 | 0.219 | ||
| Uterine position | Anteverted (70) | 43 | 27 | 30.151 ± 11.023 | 6.074 ± 4.363 | 11.447 ± 6.888 | 2.427 ± 1.516 |
| Retroverted (45) | 29 | 14 | 25.043 ± 11.679 | 5.868 ± 4.450 | 14.513 ± 7.210 | 3.462 ± 2.365 | |
| t/χ² | 0.417 | 2.369 | 0.246 | 2.288 | 2.610 | ||
| P value | 0.552 | 0.020 | 0.806 | 0.024 | 0.011 | ||
| History of induced abortion | 0 (54) | 32 | 20 | 28.978 ± 11.596 | 5.816 ± 4.038 | 12.441 ± 6.344 | 2.898 ± 2.111 |
| 1 (35) | 23 | 12 | 31.406 ± 9.595 | 5.755 ± 3.586 | 11.866 ± 6.780 | 2.711 ± 1.909 | |
| ≥ 2 (26) | 17 | 18 | 22.058 ± 11.783a | 6.684 ± 5.894 | 14.127 ± 9.038 | 2.857 ± 1.712 | |
| F/χ² | 2.365 | 5.601 | 0.416 | 0.787 | 0.099 | ||
| P value | 0.321 | 0.005 | 0.661 | 0.458 | 0.906 | ||
| Endometrial grade | A (52) | 34 | 18 | 28.768 ± 11.190 | 6.217 ± 4.455 | 11.746 ± 6.254 | 2.349 ± 1.266 |
| B (39) | 21 | 18 | 29.634 ± 11.939 | 6.195 ± 4.555 | 13.654 ± 8.558 | 2.952 ± 2.058 | |
| C (24) | 17 | 5 | 24.407 ± 11.144 | 5.181 ± 3.984 | 12.963 ± 6.447 | 3.683 ± 2.648b | |
| F/χ² | 3.455 | 1.690 | 0.518 | 0.822 | 4.171 | ||
| P value | 0.185 | 0.189 | 0.597 | 0.442 | 0.018 | ||
| Age, year | ≤ 35 (80) | 52 | 27 | 28.323 ± 11.848 | 5.613 ± 3.752 | 11.800 ± 6.092 | 2.778 ± 1.974 |
| > 35 (35) | 20 | 14 | 27.761 ± 10.851 | 6.862 ± 5.519 | 14.583 ± 8.908 | 2.954 ± 1.920 | |
| t/χ² | 0.504 | 0.240 | 1.221 | 1.684 | 0.442 | ||
| P value | 0.526 | 0.811 | 0.228 | 0.099 | 0.659 | ||
| Age | r | / | 0.139 | 0.056 | 0.063 | 0.066 | |
| P value | / | 0.139 | 0.552 | 0.500 | 0.483 | ||
| Uterine longitudinal diameter | r | / | 0.069 | 0.044 | 0.080 | 0.170 | |
| P value | / | 0.462 | 0.644 | 0.393 | 0.069 | ||
| Uterine endometrial thickness | r | / | 0.317 | 0.083 | 0.152 | 0.035 | |
| P value | / | 0.001 | 0.376 | 0.104 | 0.710 | ||
- Citation: Zhang HP, Chen ML, Xue SL, Zou J, Wu JJ, Zhou YQ. Value of endometrial peristalsis analysis technique in detecting and analyzing endometrial peristalsis features. World J Radiol 2025; 17(9): 111215
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i9/111215.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i9.111215