Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2025; 17(5): 106102
Published online May 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i5.106102
Published online May 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i5.106102
Table 6 Patient distribution by anorectal angle condition (n = 57)
Resting | Kegel | Defecation | ||||||
ARA condition | n | % | ARA condition | n | % | ARA condition | n | % |
Normal | 46 | 80.7 | Expected narrowing | 32 | 56.1 | Expected widening | 37 | 64.9 |
Narrowed | 9 | 15.8 | Diminished narrowing | 25 | 43.9 | Diminished widening | 15 | 26.3 |
Widened | 2 | 3.5 | No change | 1 | 1.8 | |||
Paradoxical narrowing | 4 | 7.0 |
- Citation: Or-Rashid MH, Sultana A, Khanduker N, Ony TA, Hossain MM, Rahman J, Chowdhury MZ, Ahmed WU, Uddin MN, Uzzaman MS. Magnetic resonance defecography assessment of obstructed defecation syndrome in patients with chronic constipation in a tertiary care hospital. World J Radiol 2025; 17(5): 106102
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i5/106102.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i5.106102