©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Nov 28, 2025; 17(11): 114754
Published online Nov 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i11.114754
Published online Nov 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i11.114754
Table 1 Methodological comparison of standard large language models and large concept models
| Feature | LLMs | LCMs |
| Level of abstraction | Token-level prediction (word/sub word) | Concept-level prediction (sentence/idea) |
| Input representation | Processes individual tokens, language-specific | Uses sentence embeddings, language-agnostic |
| Reasoning and planning | Focuses on local predictions, lacks structured reasoning | Explicitly models hierarchical reasoning and structured planning |
| Zero-shot generalization | Requires fine-tuning for new tasks/Languages | Strong zero-shot learning across languages and modalities |
| Architectural modularity | Monolithic transformer, hard to modify | Modular design, allows easy extension and updates |
- Citation: Merchant SA, Merchant N, Varghese SL, Shaikh MJS. Large language models and large concept models in radiology: Present challenges, future directions, and critical perspectives. World J Radiol 2025; 17(11): 114754
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i11/114754.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i11.114754