BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Nov 28, 2025; 17(11): 112638
Published online Nov 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i11.112638
Table 2 Comparison of clinical applications of ultrasound and computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of thyroid-associated orbitopathy
Technical dimension
Ultrasound
CT/MRI
Ref.
Spatial resolutionModerate (can distinguish muscle/fat layers)High (MRI provides superior muscle texture detail)[1,76]
Hemodynamic assessmentSuperior (real-time Doppler quantification)Limited (requires contrast-enhanced scanning)[46,77]
Disease activity stagingBased on hemodynamic + structural dynamicsMRI T2 signal indicates edema[1]
Bony structure assessmentCannot visualize bony wallsEssential (preoperative surgical decompression planning)[76]
Cost and accessibilitySuperior (portable equipment)Higher (especially MRI)[46,76]
SafetySuperior (non-ionizing, repeatable)CT radiation risk; MRI metallic contraindications[46,76]


Write to the Help Desk