©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Oct 28, 2025; 17(10): 108804
Published online Oct 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i10.108804
Published online Oct 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i10.108804
Table 1 Imaging technique
| CT | MRI | CEUS | |
| Availability | Broadly available | Limited accessibility | Limited accessibility |
| Costs | Less expensive | High | Less expensive |
| Radiation exposure | Moderate | None | None |
| Time taken | Fast | Long | Fast |
| Advantages | Good soft tissue contrast | High soft tissue contrast; Problem-solving technique | High temporal resolution; No nephrotoxicity of contrast agents |
| Limits | Nephrotoxicity of contrast agents; Radiation exposure | Claustrophobia; Metal and medical implants (e.g., peace-makers) due to magnetic field pulses | High level of operator expertise; Deep lesion location Patient obesity |
- Citation: Agnello F, Taibbi A, Galia M, Orlando A, Gagliardo C, Bartolotta TV. Hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response: Imaging findings and criteria. World J Radiol 2025; 17(10): 108804
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i10/108804.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i10.108804