©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2020; 12(6): 87-100
Published online Jun 28, 2020. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v12.i6.87
Published online Jun 28, 2020. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v12.i6.87
Table 5 Strengths and limitations of each imaging modality for assessing cardiac amyloidosis
| Modality | Echocardiography | Magnetic resonance imaging | Nuclear imaging |
| Strengths | Availability and portable | Lack of radiation | Distinguishing between AL/ATTR |
| Low cost | High spatial resolution | ||
| Lack of radiation | Chamber quantification | ||
| Lack of contrast | Tissue characterization | ||
| Chamber quantification | Quantifying myocardial fibrosis | ||
| Diastolic function | |||
| Strain | |||
| Weaknesses | Variable spatial resolution | Higher cost | Higher cost |
| Low specificity | Availability may be limited | Availability may be limited | |
| No tissue characterization | Gadolinium-based contrast administration | Radiation exposure | |
| Not distinguish AL/ATTR | Claustrophobia | ||
| Not able to assess and quantify myocardial fibrosis | Metallic device | ||
| Not able to distinguish between AL/ATTR |
- Citation: Wang TKM, Abou Hassan OK, Jaber W, Xu B. Multi-modality imaging of cardiac amyloidosis: Contemporary update. World J Radiol 2020; 12(6): 87-100
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v12/i6/87.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v12.i6.87