Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. May 26, 2017; 9(5): 422-428
Published online May 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i5.422
Table 1 Randomised control trials which show an increased yield of atrial fibrillation detection with extended cardiac monitoring
Ref.DesignNo. of patientsInclusion/exclusion criteriaType of monitoringOutcomeComments
Higgins et al[14] (2013)RCT100Inclusion: Ischaemic stroke within 7 d; Exclusion: History of AF7-d event recorder vs 24-h ECG (control)Detection of AF: Sustained (> 20 s) and non-sustained (minimum 6 beats)Sustained AF detected in 18% (control 2%); Non-sustained AF in 44% (control 4%)
Gladstone et al[15] (2014)RCT572Inclusion: Cryptogenic stroke, Age ≥ 55 yr; Exclusion: History of AF30-d triggered event recorder vs 24-h ECG (control)Detection of AF (> 30 s)AF detected in 16.1% (control 3.2%)
Sanna et al[16] (2014)RCT441Inclusion: Cryptogenic stroke, Age ≥ 40 yr; Exclusion: History of AF (including 24-h ECG)Insertable cardiac monitor vs Standard care (control)Detection of AF (> 30 s)At 6 mo, AF detected in 8.9% (control 1.4%) At 12 mo, AF detected in 12.4% (control 2.0%) At 36 mo, AF detected in 30% (control 3.0%)
Brachmann et al[17] (2016)