Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Cardiol. Jan 26, 2020; 12(1): 7-25
Published online Jan 26, 2020. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v12.i1.7
Table 1 Conditions that contribute to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Obesity
Hypertension
Coronary artery disease
Atrial fibrillation
Diabetes mellitus
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Obstructive sleep apnea
Anemia
Table 2 Clinical characteristics of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure and reduced ejection fraction
HFpEFHFrEF
SexWomen (62%)Men (60%)
Age (yr)7470
Obesity41.4%35.5%
Diabetes mellitus45%40%
Hypertension77%69%
Chronic kidney disease56%45%
Coronary artery disease50%`59%
Prior myocardial infarction24%36%
LV remodelingConcentricEccentric
LV ejection fraction≥ 50%< 40%
Atrial fibrillation in hospitalized patients65%53%
Ventricular dysrhythmias3%11%
Hospitalizations for heart failureIncreasingDecreasing
Therapies that decrease mortalityNone at present timeBeta-Blockers, ACE inhibitors, biventricular pacemakers, coronary revascularization
Table 3 Echocardiographic indices of diastolic dysfunction
1. The ratio of the mitral blood flow velocity into the LV in early diastole (the E wave) to peak blood flow velocity in late diastole caused by atrial contraction (the A wave), or the E/A ratio, ≥ 2. The normal E/A is approximately 0.8. However, tachycardia, atrioventricular block, and left bundle branch block can lead to fusion of E and A waves, and ambiguity in diastolic function assessment.
2. Increased left atrial pressure measured by early mitral blood flow velocity across the mitral valve (E wave) to the early diastolic velocity (e’) of the lateral mitral annulus, or E/e’ ratio. An E/e’ ratio 10 = mild and E/e’ ratio > 14 = significant LV dysfunction. If the lateral mitral annulus e' velocity is not quantifiable, the septal mitral annular e' velocity can be used. In this case, the E/e’ is increased if the ratio is > 15.
3. Lateral mitral annular e’ velocity < 10 cm/s or septal e’ mitral annular velocity < 7 cm/s.
4. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 35 mmHg indicative of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure = 4 × (peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity)2 + estimated right atrial pressure. These criteria should not be used in patients with significant pulmonary disease.
5. An echocardiographic determination of global longitudinal strain of -16.05 ± 2.16. This measurement can separate patients with HFpEF from patients with hypertension and normal controls in whom the global longitudinal strain measurements are -18.58 ± 2.84 and -19.59 ± 1.49, respectively.
Table 4 Heart failure preserved ejection fraction scoring system: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Clinical characteristicClinical measurementPoints awarded
HeavyBody mass index > 30 kg/m2Two
HypertensionTwo or more hypertensive medicationsOne
Atrial fibrillationParoxysmal or persistentThree
Pulmonary hypertension by echocardiogramPulmonary artery systolic pressure > 35 mmhgOne
ElderlyAge > 60 yrOne
LV filling pressure by echocardiogramEchocardiographic e/e’ > 9One
Table 5 Survival after cardiac magnetic resonance determined extracellular volume determination
CMR ECVYear oneYear twoYear threeYear four
ECV < 25%95.8%95.8%95.8%82.1%
25% ≤ ECV < 30%95.5%90.5%87.6%81.1%
30% ≤ ECV < 35%88.0%77.3%69.6%65%
35% > ECV < 40%82.2%74.3%69.4%61.7%
ECV ≤ 40%40.0%40.0%40.0%40.0%
Cardiac amyloid47.1%23.5%0%0%
Table 6 Pharmacologic studies in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Ref.Drug vs controlDrug half-life hoursNumber patientsDurationLVEFResults
Beta-blockers
Swedish Heart Failure Registry[81]All BBs (prescribed at discharge6-h Atenolol; 12-19 h Nevibolol8244755 dLVEF 49%-50% and LVEF > 50%β-blockers decreased mortality but not combined all-cause mortality or hospitalizations
SWEDIC Trial[82]Carvedilol6-10 h976 moLVEF ≥ 40%E/A ratio improved but no other measures of diastolic function
J-DHF Trial[83]Carvedilol6-10 h24538 moLVEF ≥ 40%Standard dose, but not low dose, carvedilol reduced; CV mortality and hospitalizations
COHERE Registry[84]Carvedilol6-10 h428012 moLVEF > 40%Carvedilol had no mortality benefit but decreased hospitalization
SENIORS[85,86]Nebivolol2.5-20 h64321 moLVEF > 35%Nebivolol did not decrease CV hospitalizations or mortality
ELANDD Trial[87]Nebivolol2.5-20 h11621 moLVEF ≥ 45%Nebivolol did not increase exercise capacity
CIBIS-ELD Trial[88]Bisoprolol vs Carvedilol9-12 vs 6-10 h2503 moLVEF ≥ 45%Bisoprolol and carvedilol had no effect on established and prognostic markers of diastolic function
El-Refai et al[89]Beta Blocker (bisoprolol, carvedilol, metoprolol, labetalol, and atenolol)6-7 h (Atenolol); 9-12 h (Bisoprolol)74125 moLVEF ≥ 50%Beta blockers decreased mortality and HF rehospitalizations
β-PRESERVE[90]Metoprolol succinate vs control3-9 h120024 moLVEF ≥ 50%Trial Results not available
OPTIMIZE-HF[91]All BBs (prescribed at discharge)6-7 h Atenolol 12-19 h Nebivolol211493 moLVEF 40%-49% and ≥ 50%Beta blockers had no effect on mortality and rehospitalization
Calcium channel blockers
Setaro et al[92]Verapamil vs placebo4.5-12 h201 moLVEF ≥ 45%Verapamil increased exercise capacity clinicoradio-graphic score. No change in LVEF.
Hung et al[93]Verapamil vs placebo4.5-12 h153 moNormal LVEFVerapamil increased exercise time and LV diastolic function
ACE inhibitors
Aronow et al[94]Enalapril vs control (diuretics alone)11 h213 moLVEF ≥ 50%Enalapril increased exercise time and LVEF
PEP-CHF trial[95]ACE inhibitor (perindopril) vs placebo3-10 h with prolonged terminal elimination20712 moLVEF ≥ 45%Perindopril increased 6 min walk distance but did not decrease mortality
Angiotensin II receptor blockers
I-PRESERVE[96]Irbesartan vs placebo11-15 h456324 moLVEF ≥ 45%No decrease in hospitalization or mortality
CHARM-Preserved[97]Candesartan vs control medication (ACE Inhibitor, BB, CCB)9 h302337 moLVEF ≥ 40%Candesartan slightly decreased hospitalizations but did not decrease mortality
Angiotensin receptor blocker/nephrilysin inhibitors
PARAMOUNT Trial[98]Sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan11.5 h3013 and 8-9 moLVEF ≥ 45%Sacubiril Valsartan reduced NT-proBNP
PARAGON-HF Governmental Trial NCT01920711Sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan11.5430057 moLVEF ≥ 45%Sacubitril/valsartan not superior to valsartan alone in decreasing hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality
Ivabradine
Kosmala et al[99]Ivabradine vs placebo11 h617 dLVEF ≥ 50%Ivabradine increased exercise time, peak oxygen uptake, and decreased E/e’
EDIFY trial[100]Ivabradine vs placebo11 h1798 moLVEF ≥ 45%No improvement in 6 min walk, E/e’, or NT-proBNP
Statins
Fukuta et al[101]Standard HF therapy with a statin vs without a statin2 h (lovastatin)-19 h (rosuvastatin)13721 moLVEF ≥ 50%Statin therapy associated with reduced mortality
Ouzounian et al[102]Standard HF therapy with a statin vs without a statin2 h (lovastatin)-19 h (rosuvastatin)645138 moLVEF ≥ 50%Statins did not decrease morbidity or mortality in patients with HF without CAD
Animal model of heart ailure (rats)[103]Standard HF therapy with rosuvastatin vs without rosuvastatin19 h4619 moPreserved EFStatins had no benefit
Digoxin
(DIG) trial[104]Digoxin vs placebo36-48 h98837 moLVEF ≥ 45%Digoxin had no effect on all-cause and CV mortality, heart failure hospitalizations
Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors
RELAX trial[105]Sildenafil vs placebo3-4 h21624 moLVEF ≥ 50%No improvement in 6 min walk distance, clinical status, or peak O2 consumption
Nitrates
NEAT-HFpEF trial[106]Isosorbide mononitrate vs placebo2.5-5.1 h11022 moLVEF ≥ 50%No improvement in 6 min walk distance or NT-proBNP
INDIE-HFpEF[107,108]Inhaled inorganic nitrite vs placebo0.7 h1054 wkLVEF ≥ 50%No significant improvement in exercise tolerance, NY Heart Association Class, E/e’, NT-proBNP
Governmental trial NCT02840799Oral KNO3 vs KCL1.2 h261 moLVEF ≥ 50%KNO3 trial is in progress