Biodegradable polymer stents vs second generation drug eluting stents: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 8, Issue 2

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Cardiology

ISSN

1949-8462

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Cardiol. Feb 26, 2016; 8(2): 240-246
Published online Feb 26, 2016. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i2.240

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Study selection. DES: Drug eluting stents.

Citation: Pandya B, Gaddam S, Raza M, Asti D, Nalluri N, Vazzana T, Kandov R, Lafferty J. Biodegradable polymer stents vs second generation drug eluting stents: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Cardiol 2016; 8(2): 240-246
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v8/i2/240.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v8.i2.240

Pandya B, Gaddam S, Raza M, Asti D, Nalluri N, Vazzana T, Kandov R, Lafferty J. Biodegradable polymer stents vs second generation drug eluting stents: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Cardiol 2016; 8(2): 240-246 [PMID: 26981219 DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i2.240]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.