Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Cardiol. Dec 26, 2016; 8(12): 735-745
Published online Dec 26, 2016. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i12.735
Table 7 Summary of studies comparing the rate of permanent pacemaker between the S3 and XT device
PPMS3XTP valuePredictor/comments
Binder et al[40] 2015 Circulation interventions17%13%0.01Predictors: Depth, RBBB
Binder et al[14] 2013 JACC interventions13.30%Excluded patient with LBBB, PR > 200 ms No predictors studied
Husser et al[25] 2015 JACC interventions15.20%Predictors not studied
Binder et al[40] 2015 EuroIntervention20.70%Predictor > 8 mm depth of implants
Nijhoff et al[17] 2015 Circulation interventions9.80%8.80%0.94High implants: 80/20 in aorta as mentioned by authors