Cost-effectiveness modelling of percutaneous coronary interventions in stable coronary artery disease

Table 3 Effectiveness data of bare metal stent model

	Minimum	Maximum	Ref.
Probability of success after a first bare metal stent	70.9%	86.4%	Simsek et al[19] Daemen et al[33] Bakhai et al[20] Morice et al[22] Weisz et al[24]
Probability of success after 1 yr of surveillance following a first bare metal stent	85%	96%	Simsek et al[19]
Probability of undergoing a second PCI following a coronary angiography after a failure of a bare metal stent	80%	-	Malenka et al[28]
Probability of undergoing a surgery following a coronary angiography after a failure of a bare metal stent	10%	15%	Malenka et al[28]
Probability of undergoing a DES after a failure of a bare metal stent	50%	-	Konstance et al[34]
Probability of success of a DES after a failure of a bare metal stent	78%	89%	Steinberg et al[29]
Probability of success of a second bare metal stent after a failure of a first bare metal stent	58%	67.3%	Singh et al[35]
Probability of success of a CABG surgery following a coronary angiography after a failure of a bare metal stent	90%	-	Malenka et al[28] Konstance et al[34]
Probability of success of pharmaceutical treatment after a failure of a bare metal stent	85%	90%	Sheiban et al[18]

DES: Drug eluting stents; PCI: Percutaneous coronary interventions; CABG: Coronary artery bypass graft.