Review
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. Aug 26, 2013; 5(8): 270-279
Published online Aug 26, 2013. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v5.i8.270
Table 2 Summary of the correlation between cardiac magnetic resonance T2* and cardiac function in thalassemia major
Population/sizeType of studyFindingsCorrelationRef.
TM/776 patientsRetrospectiveSignificant correlation between LVEF and cardiac R2* (r = -0.327, P < 0.0001)/Marsella et al[59]
TM/106 patientsProspectiveSignificant correlation of myocardial T2* below 20 ms with LVEF (r = 0.61, P < 0.0001), LVESVi (r = 0.50, P < 0.0001), and LV mass index (r = 0.40, P < 0.001)/Anderson et al[16]
TM/167 patientsProspectiveSignificant relationship between myocardial iron and LVEF (r = 0.57, P < 0.001)/Tanner et al[60]
TM/67 patientsCross sectionalMyocardial T2* related to LV diastolic function (EPFR, r = –0.20, P = 0.19; APFR, r = 0.49, P < 0.001; EPFR/APFR ratio, r = –0.62, P < 0.001)/Westwood et al[52]
TM/33 patientsCross sectionalGood correlation of DT, Tei index and E/Em index with cardiac T2* values (P < 0.05, r = 0.70-0.81) and weak correlation of E/A with T2* (P < 0.05, r = -0.44)/Barzin et al[84]
TM/47 patientsRetrospectiveSignificant correlations of the myocardial T2* with LVESVi and LVEDVi (r = -0.32, P = 0.027; r = -0.29, P = 0.046, respectively)/Bayraktaroğlu et al[22]
TM/19 patients, SCD/17 patientsCross sectionalSignificant relationship between LVEF and myocardial T2*/Wood et al[61]