Guidelines For Clinical Practice
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. May 26, 2012; 4(5): 157-172
Published online May 26, 2012. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v4.i5.157
Table 2 Clinical trials comparing prophylactic renal replacement therapy and control group for radiocontrast-induced nephropathy after coronary angiography procedure (baseline chronic kidney disease stage 3)
Ref.Time from contrast exposure to the start of RRT (modes of RRT and duration)No. of patients (RRT:control)Incidence of RCIN results (RR, 95% CI)Permanent dialysis rate of RCINIn-hospital mortality of RCIN
Lehnert et al[70] (1998) diagnostic procedures63 ± 6 min (HD 3 h)30 (15:15)8/15 vs 6/15 (RR = 1.33, 0.61-2.91)NANA
Sterner et al[72] (2000) diagnostic procedures< 3 h (HD 3 h)32 (15:17)6/15 vs 4/17 (RR = 1.70, 0.59-4.90)NANA
Berger et al[71] (2001) diagnostic procedures106 ± 25 min (HD 2–3 h)15 (7:8)3/7 vs 1/8 (RR = 3.43, 0.45-25.93)NANA
Vogt et al[73] (2001) diagnostic procedures2 h (HD 3 h)113 (55:58)24/55 vs 20/58 (RR = 1.27, 0.80-2.01)3/55 vs 2/58 (RR = 1.58, 0.27-9.11)1/55 vs 1/58 (RR = 1.06, 0.06-17.30)
Frank et al[74] (2003) diagnostic procedures0 (HD 4 h)17 (7:10)NA2/7 vs 2/10 (RR = 1.43, 0.26-7.86)NA
Reinecke et al[78] (2007) diagnostic procedures< 20 min (HD 4 h)273 (135:139)22/135 vs 10/138 (RR = 2.28, 1.12-4.64)2/135 vs 1/137 (RR = 2.03, 0.19-22.12)3/135 vs 3 137 (RR =1.02, 0.20-5.12)