BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. Aug 26, 2010; 2(8): 243-250
Published online Aug 26, 2010. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v2.i8.243
Table 4 Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and atrial fibrillation
Ref.Study designSubjectsConclusion
Murray et al[76]Prospective study, retrospective analysis732 patients; AF rhythm controlNo difference in AF recurrence
Madrid et al[71]Prospective (electrical cardioversion)154 patients; amiodarone only vs amiodarone + irbesartanRecurrence of AF lower in irbesartan group
Zaman et al[73]Prospective (electrical cardioversion)47 patients; ACEI vs no ACEI groupNumber of defibrillation attempts required for successful cardioversion was less in ACEI group
Ueng et al[72]Prospective (electrical cardioversion)125 patients; amiodarone only vs amiodarone + enalaprilEnalapril group had decreased rate of recurrence
Pedersen et al[65]Prospective (post-MI)1577 patients with LV dysfunction post-MI; trandolapril vs controlTrandolapril reduces AF
SOLVD[66]Prospective study, but retrospective analysis (heart failure)374 patients with depressed LV function; enalapril vs controlAF rate lower in ACEI group
Val-HeFT[78]Prospective study, retrospective analysis (heart failure)4409 patients with; valsartan vs controlARB lower incidence of AF
CHARM[77]Prospective study, retrospective analysis (heart failure)5518 patients; candesartan vs controlARB lowers incidence of AF in both normal and depressed ejection fraction
L'Allier et al[79]Retrospective (hypertension)5463 patients receiving ACEI vs 5463 patients receiving CCBThe incidence of AF was lower in ACEI group
Miceli et al[80]Retrospective (post-CABG)10 023 patients undergoing isolated CABG; ACEI vs non-ACEIACEI treatment is associated with an increased risk of post-operative AF
Madrid et al[81]Meta-analysisSeven trials involving a total of 24 849 patientsThere was a significant statistical difference in the development AF with ACEI/ARB treatment
Kalus et al[82]Meta-analysisFour trialsThere was a significant statistical difference in the development AF with ACEI/ARB treatment
Anand et al[83]Meta-analysisNine randomized controlled trialsThe use of ACEIs and ARBs had an overall effect of 18% risk reduction in new-onset AF across the trials and 43% risk reduction in patients with heart failure
Jibrini et al[84]Meta-analysis11 randomized trialsOverall, inhibition of the RAAS reduced the RR of AF by 19%. Reduction in AF was greatest in patients after electrical cardioversion and in patients with heart failure
Healey et al[85]Meta-analysis11 randomized trialsOverall, ACEIs and ARBs reduced the relative risk of AF by 28%. Reduction in AF was similar between ACEI and ARB and was greatest in patients with heart failure. Overall, there was no significant reduction in AF in patients with hypertension


Write to the Help Desk