Review
Copyright ©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Cardiol. Apr 26, 2010; 2(4): 78-88
Published online Apr 26, 2010. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v2.i4.78
Table 2 Features favoring PCI or CABG
Indications in favor of PCIIndications in favor of CABG
AbsoluteSuitable coronary anatomy for stenting with preserved left ventricular function (≥ 40%)Patient who refuses PCI
Patient who refuses surgeryContraindication to antiplatelet therapy including aspirin, heparin, and thienopyridine (ticlopidine or clopidogrel)
History of serious allergic reaction to stainless steel, drugs on drug-eluting stents, and contrast agent
History of known coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis
Pregnant women
RelativeLesion restricted to the LMCA ostium or shaftComplex coronary anatomies at LMCA, unsuitable for stenting (e.g. severe calcification, severe tortuosity, etc.)
Isolated LMCA lesionTotal occlusions at other major epicardial coronary arteries (≥ 2)
Bail-out procedure (e.g. dissection at the LMCA complicated during angiography or PCI)Multivessel stenosis except LMCA
Acute myocardial infarction at the LMCA, in which emergent revascularization is necessaryDecreased left ventricular dysfunction (< 40%)
Cardiogenic shock due to LMCA stenosis, in which emergent revascularization is necessaryExtensive peripheral vascular disease, in which placement of guiding catheter or intra-aortic balloon pump is not likely to be performed
Age ≥ 80 yrIn-stent restenosis at the LMCA, in which repeat PCI is not likely to be performed
Serious co-morbid disease (e.g. chronic lung disease, poor general performance, etc.)
Limited life expectancy of less than 1 yr
Prior CABG
Coronary anatomy, unsuitable for CABG (e.g. poor distal run-off)