Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Cardiol. Aug 26, 2026; 18(8): 125199
Published online Aug 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.125199
Published online Aug 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.125199
Table 2 Comparative summary of the human clinical evidence in cardiac xenotransplantation
| Case | Evidence model | Donor genotype | Preservation strategy | Immunosuppression | Follow-up duration | Dominant complications | Key limitations | Ref. |
| University of Maryland, January 2022 | Living compassionate-use recipient | 10-gene-edited pig (GGTA1/CMAH/B4GALNT2 knockout, GHR knockout; hCD46, hCD55, hTBM, hEPCR, hCD47, hHMOX1 transgenes) | Not fully reported in the primary publication | Investigational anti-CD40 costimulation blockade combined with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids | 60 days (recipient died on POD 60) | Progressive diastolic dysfunction from POD 47; capillary injury with complement deposition; PCMV/PRV reactivation within the graft; IVIG-associated rise in anti-pig IgG | Single compassionate-use case; non-approved investigational agents; latent donor viral infection missed by conventional screening; mechanism of graft failure multifactorial and incompletely resolved | [14,15] |
| University of Maryland, September 2023 | Living compassionate-use recipient | 10-gene-edited pig (same editing platform) | Not fully reported | Costimulation blockade with intensified complement-directed therapy | Approximately 40 days (died October 30, 2023) | Early antibody-mediated rejection on biopsy at 2 weeks; subsequent anti-pig antibody surge with progressive graft injury and renal failure | Single compassionate-use case; antibody-mediated rejection emerged despite a healthier recipient, enhanced donor screening, and complement inhibition | [16,17] |
| NYU Langone, 2022 (two cases) | Deceased (brain-dead) recipient research model | 10-gene-edited pig | Standard clinical procurement and preservation | Conventional allotransplant-style immunosuppression without investigational agents | Protocol-defined observation period of 66 hours (not patient survival) | Functional decline in one graft attributed to donor-recipient size mismatch; no rejection and no zoonotic transmission observed | Very short observation window; brain-death physiology does not model living recipients; cannot inform on long-term survival, chronic rejection, or infection risk | [18] |
- Citation: Wan CH, Zhou BY, Guan YL. Cardiac xenotransplantation: From imagination to achievable practice. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(8): 125199
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v18/i8/125199.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.125199