BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Cardiol. Aug 26, 2026; 18(8): 125199
Published online Aug 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.125199
Table 1 Key events in the development of clinical cardiac xenotransplantation
Year
Surgeon/team
Institution, country
Donor
Transplant type
Recipient profile
Survival/observation
Key outcome/Lesson
Ref.
1964HardyUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, United StatesChimpanzeeOHTMoribund man with terminal heart failureAbout 2 hoursGraft failure from donor-recipient size mismatch with early antibody-mediated injury; established the need for size matching and recognition of the preformed-antibody barrier[7,8]
1968CooleyTexas Heart Institute, Houston, United StatesSheepOHT48-year-old man with terminal ischemic cardiomyopathyMinutesHyperacute rejection in the operating room; demonstrated the preformed natural antibody/complement barrier against discordant species[8]
1968RossNational Heart Hospital, London, United KingdomPigHHT48-year-old man with terminal heart diseaseMinutes (about 4 minutes)Immediate hyperacute rejection; confirmed the hyperacute barrier for pig-to-human grafts and redirected the field toward concordant donors and, later, genetic engineering[8]
1977BarnardGroote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, South AfricaBaboon; chimpanzeeHHT (circulatory support)Two patients with postcardiotomy shock unable to be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass< 1 day (baboon); 4 days (chimpanzee)Heterotopic xenografts can provide temporary mechanical support, but rejection occurred before native-heart recovery, highlighting the need for effective immunosuppression[9]
1984BaileyLoma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, United StatesBaboonOHTNeonate (“Baby Faye”) with hypoplastic left heart syndrome21 daysLongest survival of the pre-genetic era under cyclosporine-based immunosuppression; death from humoral rejection across an ABO-incompatible barrier; catalyzed scientific and ethical debate[10]
2022Griffith/MohiuddinUniversity of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, United States10-gene-edited pig1OHT57-year-old man with end-stage heart failure, ineligible for allotransplantation or LVAD; FDA compassionate use (living recipient)260 daysProof-of-concept xenograft function; late graft failure associated with PCMV/PRV reactivation, IVIG-associated anti-pig IgG, and progressive diastolic dysfunction; recipient died on POD 60[14,15]
2022MoazamiNYU Langone Health, New York, United States10-gene-edited pig1OHTTwo deceased (brain-dead) recipients on ventilatory support3Observation period (66 hours)3No hyperacute, cellular, or antibody-mediated rejection and no zoonotic transmission during observation; dysfunction in one graft attributed to donor-recipient size mismatch[18]
2023Griffith/MohiuddinUniversity of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, United States10-gene-edited pig1OHT58-year-old man with end-stage heart failure, ineligible for allotransplantation; FDA compassionate use (living recipient)2About 40 days (died October 30, 2023)Early biopsy evidence of antibody-mediated rejection by about 2 weeks despite a less compromised recipient, enhanced donor screening, and complement inhibition; graft failure led to withdrawal of support[16,17]


Write to the Help Desk