BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Cardiol. Aug 26, 2026; 18(8): 123559
Published online Aug 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.123559
Table 2 Results of the systematic review
Ref.
Study design
Study location
Population characteristics
Intervention
Primary outcomes
Key findings
Muntané-Carol et al[18] (2021)Prospective multicenterCanada, United StatesTAVR recipients without prior pacemakerMinimalist TAVR with 14-day AECG monitoringOccurrence of delayed HAVB or CHB4.6% (21/459) developed delayed HAVB/CHB, leading to PPM in 81%
Pavlicek et al[19] (2023)Prospective cohortGermanySevere AS; 54% male; mean age 80TAVR with SEV (n = 103) or BEV (n = 100)HAVB requiring PPM within 30 days7% (15/203) required PPI; new LBBB (OR = 15.7) and diabetes (OR = 3.8) were predictors
Meduri et al[28] (2019)RCT (REPRISE III)United States, GermanyHigh/extreme surgical risk; mean age 83Lotus mechanically-expanded vs CoreValve SEVPPM within 30 days and dependency at 1 yearPPM higher with Lotus (34%) vs CoreValve (18%); dependency was 43% at 30 days
Castro-Mejía et al[36] (2022)Retrospective multicenterSpainSevere AS; 39% male; median age 83New-generation SEVs (Evolut, Acurate, Portico, Allegra)Peri-procedural modification of AV conduction17.7% required PPI; valve recapture (OR = 2.8) and depth (OR = 1.9) were predictors
Auffret et al[22] (2017)Multicenter registryGlobal (Canada, France, Spain, etc.)AS candidates; 50% male; mean age 82TAVR grouped by baseline RBBBCumulative all-cause mortalityBaseline RBBB in 10.3%; 30-day PPM in RBBB (40.1%) vs others (13.5%)
Bagur et al[23] (2012)Case-matched cohortCanadaElderly AS; matched by baseline ECGTAVI (Edwards) vs isolated SAVRComplete AVB and PPM within 30 daysPPM higher in TAVI (7.3%) vs SAVR (3.4%); RBBB predicted TAVI PPM (OR = 8.6)
Wasim et al[30] (2025)Prospective observational cohortNorwaySevere AS; 50% male; mean age 80.6TAVI (various valves) over low vs high volume phasesNew PPM ≤ 30 days and all-cause death31.6% total PPI rate; dropped from 45.8% to 23.9% with experience
Chen et al[25] (2024)Registry analysisUnited States, CanadaIntermediate/high risk PARTNER 2 S3 registriesTAVR with balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3New PPM within 30 days12.5% required PPI; RBBB (OR = 5.8) and depth > 6 mm (OR = 1.86) were predictors
Dizon et al[31] (2015)RCT and registry analysisUnited States, CanadaInoperable/high-risk AS (PARTNER trial)TAVI (Edwards SAPIEN)1-year all-cause mortalityNew PPM (6.8%) and prior PPM (22.9%) independently predicted mortality
Natarajan et al[37] (2022)Prospective cohortCanadaOutpatient AS; mean age 81.8Routine 2-week pre/post rACMCompliance to rACM and unplanned post-TAVI PPMI15.6% total PPMI rate; 12.5% rACM notifications; unplanned PPMI only 3.1%
Fraccaro et al[33] (2011)Registry analysisItalyAS due to calcification; mean age 81TAVI with CoreValve systemIncidence/predictors of PPM39% required PPI; predictors were depth (P = 0.039) and pre-existing RBBB (P = 0.046)
Guetta et al[20] (2011)Registry analysisIsraelAS Israeli registry; mean age 83CoreValve TAVIDevelopment of HDAVB within 30 days36% developed HDAVB (40% total PPM); RBBB (OR = 43) and depth (OR = 22) were predictors
Husser et al[38] (2016)Prospective cohortGermany, SwitzerlandHigh-risk AS; mean age 80-81.SAPIEN 3 (n = 96) vs SAPIEN XT (n = 87)New IVCA and PPM implantationPPM rate 12.5% (S3) vs 12.6% (XT); S3 had more fascicular blocks (17% vs 5%)
Khawaja et al[27] (2011)Retrospective multicenterUnited Kingdom, IrelandUnited Kingdom CoreValve Collaborative; mean age 81.3CoreValve TAVIPPM within 30 days33.3% required PPI; predictors included peri-pro AVB (OR 6.29) and predilatation (OR 2.68)
Kooistra et al[24] (2020)Retrospective multicenterNetherlands, SpainMulti-center European registry; median age 82TAVI (SEV vs BEV vs Other)Timing of onset and predictors of late CDs12% PPM rate; 18% of these were late (> 48 hours); IVCD (OR = 3.3) and RBBB (OR = 2.6) predict late PPM
Kostopoulou et al[32] (2015)Randomized prospectiveGreeceNYHA II/III AS; mean age 81CoreValve TAVI with EPS vs ECG alonePredictors of conduction abnormalities22% PPM within 1 month; baseline HV interval (cut-off 52 ms) was prognostic
Ledwoch et al[34] (2013)Prospective registry (GARY)GermanyGerman GARY registry; mean age 81.5TAVI (CoreValve vs Sapien)Predictors of PPM up to 30 days33.7% PPM rate; independent predictors: CoreValve (OR = 2.86), porcelain aorta (OR = 1.64)
Naveh et al[21] (2017)Prospective observationalIsraelAS at Hadassah center; mean age 80.7TAVI (CoreValve vs Sapien)Predictors for long-term pacing dependency34.5% total PPI; 68.4% dependent; RBBB (OR = 18) and delta PR > 28 ms were predictors
Rampat et al[26] (2017)Retrospective multicenterUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom LOTUS experience; mean age 81.2LOTUS mechanically-expanded valvePPM up to hospital discharge31.8% PPM rate; 55.2% new LBBB; pre-procedural block composite (OR = 2.54) and absence of valve calcification (OR = 0.55) were independent predictors
Van Gils et al[29] (2018)Prospective cohort (CONDUCT)NetherlandsRotterdam cohort; mean age 79TAVI (various valves) with daily ECG monitoring.QRS dynamics vs PPM requirement23% PPM rate; only persistent QRS prolongation led to PPM in normal baseline patients


Write to the Help Desk