BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Cardiol. Jul 26, 2026; 18(7): 120973
Published online Jul 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.120973
Table 1 Trials and key evidence
Ref.
Design/population
Strategy/protocol
Key endpoints
Main findings (high level)
QDOT-FAST, 2019[6]Prospective multicenter single-arm; PAFvHPSD temperature-controlled (90 W/4 seconds algorithm)Feasibility, acute performance, safetyDemonstrated feasibility and safety of 90 W/4 seconds temperature-controlled lesions; procedural efficiency vs historical controls
POWER PLUS, 2023[12]Multicenter RCT; AF undergoing first PVIContiguous vHPSD 90 W/4 seconds vs conventional approachEfficiency; 6-month efficacy; safetyModest but significant reduction in procedure time; similar safety and 6-month efficacy; suggested hybrid approach may be optimal
SHORT-AF, 2023[10]RCT; AF ablation with PVIHPSD vs standard power-standard durationTime to PVI; 12-month freedom from AF; ACEShorter time to PVI; higher freedom from AF at 12 months; trend toward increased ACE
POWER-FAST III, 2025[11]RCT; PVI with endoscopic assessmentHPSD-70 (70 W, short) vs conventional 25-40 WArrhythmia recurrence (noninferiority); endoscopic esophageal lesionsNoninferior for recurrences; similar esophageal lesion incidence; reported symptomatic embolic events in HPSD-70 arm (technology/protocol-dependent signal)
QDOT-by-LAWT, 2024[3]RCT noninferiority; first-time PAFLA wall thickness-guided (vHPSD in thinner regions; standard/AI-guided in thicker) vs CLOSE12-month effectiveness; efficiencyNoninferior 12-month outcomes; marked reductions in RF/procedure times; supports personalization for thicker regions
Sousa et al[9], 2023RCT; PAF treated with AIHPSD vs standard LPLD (AI-guided)Noninferiority; efficiencyReported noninferiority and faster procedures with shorter ablation times (protocol- and catheter-specific)


Write to the Help Desk