Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Cardiol. Oct 26, 2026; 18(10): 125443
Published online Oct 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.125443
Published online Oct 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.125443
Table 2 Comparison of different imaging modalities in cardiac amyloidosis
| Modality | Sensitivity | Specificity | Cohort and reference standard | Primary role | Key limitation |
| Bone scintigraphy - Perugini grade ≥ 2[19] | 90% | 97% | 1217 patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis at specialist centres: 857 with histologically proven amyloid (374 by endomyocardial biopsy) and 360 with confirmed non-amyloid cardiomyopathy. Figures are for grade 2-3 uptake alone; adding a negative monoclonal screen raises specificity and positive predictive value to 100% (95%CI: 98.0-100). Addresses discrimination of ATTR from AL in patients already suspected of amyloidosis, not detection in an unselected population | Non-biopsy diagnosis of ATTR-CM | Valid only with negative serum and urine immunofixation and free light chains. Uptake of any grade is more sensitive (> 99%) but far less specific (86%), with false positives almost exclusively from AL-CA |
| Bone scintigraphy - pooled diagnostic accuracy, all tracers[20] | 92.2% (95%CI: 89%-95%) | 95.4% (95%CI: 77%-99%) | Bivariate meta-analysis of 6 studies comprising 529 patients with suspected cardiac ATTR. Differs from the row above because it pools unselected cohorts without the negative clonal screen requirement | Screening and diagnosis of ATTR-CM | Accuracy varies by tracer (DPD > PYP > HMDP); wide specificity confidence interval reflects few non-amyloid comparators; poor discriminator for AL-CA |
| CMR - ECV[21] | 90% | 91% | Meta-analysis of 18 diagnostic studies comprising 2015 patients | Diagnosis, quantification, prognostication, monitoring | Requires gadolinium; least validated in significant chronic kidney disease. Diagnostic odds ratio 84.6 (95%CI: 30.3-236.2), significantly higher than LGE |
| CMR - native T1 mapping[21] | 87% | 88% | Same meta-analysis as the row above; sensitivity and specificity did not differ significantly from LGE | Contrast-free diagnostic alternative | Vendor- and sequence-dependent (MOLLI/ShMOLLI/SASHA); absolute values are not interchangeable across field strengths |
| CMR - LGE[21] | 85% | 92% | Same meta-analysis as the two rows above; diagnostic odds ratio 20.1 (95%CI: 9.1-44.1) vs 84.6 (95%CI: 30.3-236.2) for ECV | Diagnosis, prognostication | Qualitative and pattern-based; myocardial nulling becomes difficult in advanced disease |
| Echocardiography - apical sparing of longitudinal strain[22] | 72% | 66% | 544 patients with confirmed cardiac amyloidosis (375 ATTR, 169 AL) and 200 controls in whom amyloidosis was suspected but excluded, from 12 centres in 4 countries, plus 174 healthy subjects. Diagnosis by endomyocardial biopsy with mass spectrometry, or grade 2-3 Tc99-PYP uptake without monoclonal gammopathy; controls excluded by biopsy or by negative scintigraphy and light chains. Apical sparing ratio cut-off 1.67, AUC 0.74 | First-line screening (widely available, low cost) | Specificity, rather than sensitivity, is the principal weakness: Apical sparing was present in 32% of clinically similar control patients and in 6% of healthy subjects, giving a negative predictive value of 0.50. Accuracy is further reduced in chronic kidney disease |
| Cardiac amyloid PET (11C-PiB, 18F-florbetapir/florbetaben)[23] | 78% (91% for 11C-PiB) | 95% (97% for 11C-PiB) | Derived from the PET subset of a meta-analysis of 31 articles comprising 37 studies and 2585 patients across CMR, SPECT and PET; the pooled PET figure is not drawn from all 31 articles | Emerging; AL-CA detection, particularly with negative or equivocal scintigraphy | Varies substantially by tracer; the best-performing tracer (11C-PiB) has a 20-minute half-life limiting routine use; not yet in guideline algorithms; no FDA-approved cardiac indication |
- Citation: Ashraf F. Evolving role of cardiac magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(10): 125443
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v18/i10/125443.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.125443