©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Cardiol. Jan 26, 2026; 18(1): 112321
Published online Jan 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i1.112321
Published online Jan 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i1.112321
Table 2 Logistic regression analysis for bleeding predictors
| Predictor | Unadjusted OR (95%CI) | P value | Adjusted OR (95%CI) | P value |
| Sex | 0.60 (0.20-1.89) | 0.424 | ||
| Access site | 2.35 (0.36-11.19) | 0.210 | 2.09 (0.42-8.22) | 0.318 |
| Antiplatelet use | 3.06 (0.66-28.95) | 0.158 | 2.90 (0.76-19.1) | 0.713 |
| Anticoagulant use | 0.87 (0.09-4.41) | 1 |
- Citation: Ralota KK, Tuncer D, Htun NM, Samuel R, Gupta V, Lew R, Layland J. Fixed vs weight-based heparin dosing in stable patients undergoing diagnostic coronary physiology studies. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(1): 112321
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v18/i1/112321.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v18.i1.112321