©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Cardiol. Jan 26, 2026; 18(1): 108975
Published online Jan 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i1.108975
Published online Jan 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i1.108975
Table 2 Clinical research on drug-coated balloon angioplasty for coronary large vessel disease
| Trial | Intervention | Primary end point | Secondary end point | Follow-up time | TLR/TVR | MACE | LLL | DAPT |
| RCT; RVD: 3.08 ± 0.48[65], 2016 | DCB: 27; DES: 33 | TLR; LLL | NR | 8-month | 8-month, TLR: DCB vs DES 0% vs 6.1%, P = 0.193; TVR: NR | 8-month, MACE: None of the patients in the LVD; group experienced MACE | 8-month, LLL: DCB vs DES; 0.25 ± 0.25 mm vs 0.37 ± 0.40 mm, P = 0.185 | NR |
| RCT; RVD: > 3.0[12], 2023 | DCB: 544; DES: 693 | All-cause mortality | Cardiovascular mortality, ACS, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, major bleeding and TLR | Median follow-up: DCB: 3.7 years DES: 3.6 years | DCB-only strategy has no increased all-cause mortality or any other major cardiovascular endpoints, including unplanned TLR, compared to DES | DCB-only angioplastyis safe compared to DES as part of routine clinical practice, in terms of all-cause mortality and MACE | NR | NR |
| RCT; RVD: 2.5-4.0[66], 2022 | DCB: 108; DES: 108 | TLR | MACE, cardiac death, TVMI, and vessel thrombosis | 2 years | 24-month, TLR: DCB vs DES 4.9% vs 16.33%, P = 0.008; TVR: NR | 24-month, MACE: DCB vs DES 7.84% vs 19.39%, P = 0.01718 | NR | NR |
| SCRS; RVD: ≥ 2.8[67], 2019 | LVD: 200; SVD: 327 | The efficacy and safety of DCB in the treatment of de novo lesions in large blood vessels | Indices related to the complexity of lesion preparation; LLL, TLR | Mean follow-up duration was 10.1 months | 10.1-month, TLR/TVR: LVD vs SVD; 0% vs 0.30% | 10.1-month, MACE: LVD vs SVD; 0% vs 1.40% | 10.1-month, LLL: LVD vs SVD-0.17 ± 0.62 mm vs -0.17 ± 0.43 mm, P = 0.993 | DCB-only therapy without stenting confers; the additional advantage of safety without the need for prolonged; DAPT |
| SCRS; RVD: > 2.75[68], 2024 | DCB: 708; DES: 704 | CD-TLR | All-cause mortality, major bleeding, MACE | 24 months | CD-TLR: DCB vs DES: 5.5% vs 3.1%, P = 0.028 | MACE: DCB vs DES: 7.6% vs 5.7%, P = 0.143 | NR | NR |
| SCRS; RVD: > 2.75[69], 2023 | PCB: 73; DES: 81 | TLF | Angiographic restenosis | PCB: 1536 ± 538 days; DES: 1344 days ± 606 days | TLF: PCB vs DES; 6.8% vs 14.6%, P = 0.097 | NR | NR | NR |
- Citation: Huang AX, Xie HY, Luo G, Hong L, Zhou YL, Wang Y, Gao DK. Clinical application and expansion of paclitaxel-coated balloons in coronary atherosclerotic disease. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(1): 108975
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v18/i1/108975.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v18.i1.108975