©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Cardiol. Sep 26, 2025; 17(9): 109876
Published online Sep 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.109876
Published online Sep 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.109876
Table 6 Comparative safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: Cardiovascular risks and patient considerations
| Drug class | Drug | Prevention of adverse cardiovascular effects methods | Preferred patient category | Safety comparison |
| csDMARDs | Methotrexate | Homocysteine control (target level < 10 μmol/L); Folic acid supplementation (5-10 mg/day)-reduces the risk of hyperhomocysteinemia by 50%-70%. Regular monitoring: Blood pressure (BP), ECG, echocardiography (EchoCG) (with long-term use). Lipid profile, homocysteine levels (every 6-12 months) | Patients without severe cardiovascular disease | Safer than bDMARDs and tsDMARDs but requires monitoring |
| Sulfasalazine | Caution in patients with conduction disorders; Use validated risk scores: SCORE2/SCORE2-OP for estimating 10-year CVD risk, QRISK3; Baseline & periodic evaluation: Lipid profile (LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides), hs-CRP, homocysteine (if high CVD risk). BP monitoring; ECG/Echocardiography | Patients with mild RA | Safer than biologics but less effective | |
| Leflunomide | BP control, salt restriction | Patients without a history of HTN | Similar to MTX in safety but more likely to cause HTN | |
| Hydroxychloroquine | ECG monitoring (QT interval). Before starting therapy: Measure baseline QT (corrected using Fridericia’s formula- QTc). Assess risks if QTc > 450 ms in men or > 470 ms in women (consider alternative medications). Repeat ECG 3-5 days after initiation and after each dose increase. Correction of electrolyte imbalances: Hypokalemia (K+ < 3.5 mmol/L) and hypomagnesemia (Mg2+ < 0.7 mmol/L) increase arrhythmia risk | Patients with very mild RA or SLE | Safest in this group but requires QT interval monitoring | |
| bDMARDs (TNF inhibitors) | Adalimumab | Avoid in patients with HF class III-IV | Patients without severe CVD | Higher infection risk but lower CV risk than JAK inhibitors |
| Certolizumab | BP monitoring, cardiac function assessment | Pregnant women (low placental transfer) | Similar to other TNF inhibitors | |
| Etanercept | Caution in HF | Patients with moderate CV risk | Considered safer than infliximab | |
| Golimumab | Monitor BP and HF symptoms | Patients intolerant to other TNF inhibitors | Comparable to other TNF inhibitors | |
| Infliximab | Avoid in HF class II–IV | Patients with severe RA but no CVD | Highest HF risk among TNF inhibitors | |
| Other bDMARDs | Abatacept | BP control, ECG if risk factors present | Patients at high infection risk | Safer than TNF inhibitors regarding HF |
| Anakinra | Not required | Patients with concomitant atherosclerosis | One of the safest biologics | |
| Sarilumab/Tocilizumab | Lipid monitoring, statins if needed | Patients without severe dyslipidemia | Higher CV risk than TNF inhibitors but lower than JAK inhibitors | |
| Olokizumab | Lipid profile monitoring | Patients resistant to other IL-6 inhibitors | Presumed similar to tocilizumab | |
| Rituximab | Premedication, slow infusion | Patients with lymphoproliferative disorders | Neutral CV effects but risk of infusion-related hypotension | |
| tsDMARDs (JAK inhibitors) | Baricitinib | Avoid in patients with thrombosis history, BP control, anticoagulants for AF | Younger patients without thrombosis risk factors | Least safe regarding CV risk (FDA, EMA warning-thrombosis, MI, stroke) |
| Tofacitinib | Lipid monitoring, BP control, avoid in smokers/obese patients | Patients unresponsive to bDMARDs | High CV risk, especially in smokers | |
| Upadacitinib | Thrombosis risk assessment before prescribing | Patients intolerant to other JAK inhibitors | Similar to other JAK inhibitors | |
| Filgotinib | General precautions as for other JAK inhibitors | Limited use, caution required | Presumed similar to tofacitinib |
- Citation: Zotova LA, Enenkov NV. From joints to vessels: How rheumatoid arthritis therapy alters the fate of the heart. World J Cardiol 2025; 17(9): 109876
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v17/i9/109876.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.109876