BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Cardiol. Sep 26, 2025; 17(9): 109876
Published online Sep 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.109876
Table 6 Comparative safety of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: Cardiovascular risks and patient considerations
Drug class
Drug
Prevention of adverse cardiovascular effects methods
Preferred patient category
Safety comparison
csDMARDsMethotrexateHomocysteine control (target level < 10 μmol/L); Folic acid supplementation (5-10 mg/day)-reduces the risk of hyperhomocysteinemia by 50%-70%. Regular monitoring: Blood pressure (BP), ECG, echocardiography (EchoCG) (with long-term use). Lipid profile, homocysteine levels (every 6-12 months)Patients without severe cardiovascular diseaseSafer than bDMARDs and tsDMARDs but requires monitoring
SulfasalazineCaution in patients with conduction disorders; Use validated risk scores: SCORE2/SCORE2-OP for estimating 10-year CVD risk, QRISK3; Baseline & periodic evaluation: Lipid profile (LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides), hs-CRP, homocysteine (if high CVD risk). BP monitoring; ECG/EchocardiographyPatients with mild RASafer than biologics but less effective
Leflunomide BP control, salt restrictionPatients without a history of HTNSimilar to MTX in safety but more likely to cause HTN
Hydroxychloroquine ECG monitoring (QT interval). Before starting therapy: Measure baseline QT (corrected using Fridericia’s formula- QTc). Assess risks if QTc > 450 ms in men or > 470 ms in women (consider alternative medications). Repeat ECG 3-5 days after initiation and after each dose increase. Correction of electrolyte imbalances: Hypokalemia (K+ < 3.5 mmol/L) and hypomagnesemia (Mg2+ < 0.7 mmol/L) increase arrhythmia riskPatients with very mild RA or SLESafest in this group but requires QT interval monitoring
bDMARDs (TNF inhibitors)AdalimumabAvoid in patients with HF class III-IVPatients without severe CVDHigher infection risk but lower CV risk than JAK inhibitors
CertolizumabBP monitoring, cardiac function assessmentPregnant women (low placental transfer)Similar to other TNF inhibitors
EtanerceptCaution in HFPatients with moderate CV riskConsidered safer than infliximab
GolimumabMonitor BP and HF symptomsPatients intolerant to other TNF inhibitorsComparable to other TNF inhibitors
InfliximabAvoid in HF class II–IVPatients with severe RA but no CVDHighest HF risk among TNF inhibitors
Other bDMARDsAbataceptBP control, ECG if risk factors presentPatients at high infection riskSafer than TNF inhibitors regarding HF
AnakinraNot requiredPatients with concomitant atherosclerosisOne of the safest biologics
Sarilumab/TocilizumabLipid monitoring, statins if neededPatients without severe dyslipidemiaHigher CV risk than TNF inhibitors but lower than JAK inhibitors
OlokizumabLipid profile monitoringPatients resistant to other IL-6 inhibitorsPresumed similar to tocilizumab
RituximabPremedication, slow infusionPatients with lymphoproliferative disordersNeutral CV effects but risk of infusion-related hypotension
tsDMARDs (JAK inhibitors)BaricitinibAvoid in patients with thrombosis history, BP control, anticoagulants for AFYounger patients without thrombosis risk factorsLeast safe regarding CV risk (FDA, EMA warning-thrombosis, MI, stroke)
TofacitinibLipid monitoring, BP control, avoid in smokers/obese patientsPatients unresponsive to bDMARDsHigh CV risk, especially in smokers
UpadacitinibThrombosis risk assessment before prescribingPatients intolerant to other JAK inhibitorsSimilar to other JAK inhibitors
FilgotinibGeneral precautions as for other JAK inhibitorsLimited use, caution requiredPresumed similar to tofacitinib


Write to the Help Desk