Artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing CINE enhances the workflow of cardiac magnetic resonance in challenging patients

Table 4 Alignment of left ventricle and right ventricle volume and function metrics with Conventional CINE vs Artificial-intelligence-assisted compressed sensing CINE in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (n = 31)

	mean ± SD		Bland–Altman		Intraclass coefficient
	C-CINE	AI-CS-CINE	Bias ± SD	LoA	r	95%CI
LVEF (%)	55.9 ± 13.2	57.0 ± 13.2	-1.05 ± 4.56	-10.00, 7.89	0.94	0.87, 0.97
LVEDVi (mL/m2)	75.1 ± 21.1	72.0 ± 20.2	3.16 ± 7.07	10.70, 17.02	0.93	0.85, 0.97
LVESVi (mL/m2)	34.8 ± 19.0	32.2 ± 17.2	2.55 ± 6.12	-9.45, 14.55	0.93	0.86, 0.97
LVSVi (mL/m2)	40.4 ± 10.2	39.8 ± 11.1	0.61 ± 4.52	-8.26, 9.47	0.91	0.82, 0.95
LVMi (mL/m2)	69.9 ± 29.0	70.4 ± 29.5	-0.42 ± 5.81	11.81, 10.97	0.98	0.96, 0.99
Relative wall thickness	0.5 ± 0.2	0.5 ± 0.2	0.00 ± 0.06	-0.13, 0.12	0.96	0.91, 0.98
RVEF (%)	48.9 ± 14.6	52.1 ± 13.0	-3.14 ± 9.09	20.96, 14.68	0.76	0.56, 0.88
RVEDVi (mL/m2)	70.8 ± 16.2	70.9 ± 15.1	-0.02 ± 8.72	17.12, 17.07	0.84	0.70, 0.92
RVESVi (mL/m2)	37.1 ± 16.5	34.5 ± 13.5	2.64 ± 7.65	12.36, 17.64	0.86	0.72, 0.93
RVSVi (mL/m2)	33.7 ± 10.7	36.4 ± 10.5	-2.66 ± 8.57	19.46, 14.13	0.65	0.40, 0.81

C-CINE: Conventional CINE; AI-CS-CINE: Artificial-intelligence-assisted-CINE; EDV: End-diastolic volume; EF: Ejection fraction; ESV: End-systolic volume; LV: Left ventricle; LVM: LV mass; RV: Right ventricle; SV: Stroke volume; I: Normalized to body surface area.