Artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing CINE enhances the workflow of cardiac magnetic resonance in challenging patients

Table 3 Alignment of left ventricle and right ventricle volume and function metrics with conventional CINE vs artificial-intelligence-assisted compressed sensing CINE excluding outliers (n = 89)

	mean ± SD		Bland–Altman		Intraclass coefficient
	C-CINE	AI-CS-CINE	Bias ± SD	LoA	r	95%CI
LVEF (%)	56.2 ± 11.0	55.9 ± 11.1	0.28 ± 3.78	-7.13, 7.69	0.94	0.91, 0.96
LVEDVi (mL/m2)	75.9 ± 19.0	73.3 ± 19.0	2.63 ± 5.30	-7.76, 13.01	0.95	0.93, 0.97
LVESVi (mL/m2)	34.4 ± 16.0	33.4 ± 15.7	1.02 ± 3.35	-5.55, 7.59	0.98	0.96, 0.98
LVSVi (mL/m2)	41.5 ± 9.3	39.9 ± 9.6	1.61 ± 4.21	-6.63, 9.85	0.89	0.83, 0.92
LVMi (mL/m2)	58.4 ± 20.3	59.3 ± 20.6	0.91 ± 4.14	-9.01, 7.20	0.98	0.97, 0.99
Relative wall thickness	0.4 ± 0.2	0.4 ± 0.2	0.00 ± 0.05	-0.10, 0.10	0.95	0.93, 0.97
RVEF (%)	50.8 ± 10.0	51.5 ± 10.3	0.66 ± 7.32	-15.01, 13.69	0.73	0.62, 0.82
RVEDVi (mL/m2)	71.0 ± 14.8	69.3 ± 14.7	1.74 ± 6.60	-11.21, 14.68	0.89	0.84, 0.93
RVESVi (mL/m2)	35.1 ± 11.0	33.6 ± 10.4	1.51 ± 5.28	-8.84, 11.87	0.87	0.81, 0.91
RVSVi (mL/m2)	35.9 ± 9.7	35.7 ± 10.5	0.22 ± 7.12	-13.74, 14.18	0.75	0.64, 0.83

C-CINE: Conventional CINE; AI-CS-CINE: Artificial-intelligence-assisted-CINE; EDV: End-diastolic volume; EF: Ejection fraction; ESV: End-systolic volume; LV: Left ventricle; LVM: LV mass; RV: Right ventricle; SV: Stroke volume; I: Normalized to body surface area.